Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Defense Technologies International's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Defense Technologies International (DTII) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2025
API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DTII/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DTII/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DTII/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Defense Technologies International's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Defense Technologies International Corp - - - Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 0% 0% 0% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

DTII Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

DTII Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Defense Technologies International's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Defense Technologies International Corp - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Defense Technologies International's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

DTII Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

DTII High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

Defense Technologies International's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company develops passive scanner technology based on earth magnetic principles, which is radiation-free and does not harm individuals passing through. Their scanners utilize passive sensing, distinguishing them from competitors who employ active sensing technologies such as X-ray, microwave, or radio signals. The Passive Portal Walk-through Weapons Detector was tested by the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory (NUSTL), a Department of Homeland Security division, completing over 500 successful tests within five days.
Competitor data is not yet available for Defense Technologies International.

Defense Technologies International's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
NUSTL Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cornerstone Communications Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Privateer Marketing Force Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cumulus Media Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Defense Technologies International's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.