Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Dingdong Cayman Limited's Competitiveness

Name: Dingdong Cayman Limited Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dingdong Cayman Limited (DDL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025

Competitors

Named by the company

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

vs 100.00 % a year ago

Revenue Growth Y/Y

10.23 %

Q4 2025

Net Margin

0.95 %

Q4 2025

Key Findings: Dingdong Cayman Limited vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,483M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Peer revenue share: Dingdong Cayman Limited accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

DDL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Dingdong Cayman Limited generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DDL/competitors

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DDL/relationships

https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DDL/similar

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Explore the Financial Data API

Business Relationships API API Server API Docs API Discovery

Connect Your AI Assistant

How to Connect Your AI Assistant to CSIMarket MCP MCP Server

Access this full dataset via API

Free sample Full docs All endpoints

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

AI Integration via MCP

Connect Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant directly to this data.

For context: the Internet, E-commerce, Online Shops industry grew revenue 45.8% year over year, combined, vs 10.2% for Dingdong Cayman Limited. Dingdong Cayman Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.31% to 0.99%, a loss of 0.32 percentage points.

Dingdong Cayman Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth

Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
Dingdong cayman Limited	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Similar Growth & Profitability (8)	62.50 % (5 of 8)	100.00 % (8 of 8)	75.00 % (6 of 8)	0.00 % (0 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

DDL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

DDL Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

DDL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

DDL Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Dingdong Cayman Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive environment where increased competition may impact its pricing power, market share, and brand recognition. Competitors may possess advantages such as longer operating histories, stronger brand recognition, better supplier relationships, larger user bases, higher regional penetration, and greater financial, technical, or marketing resources. Smaller companies or new entrants may enhance their market positions through acquisitions, investments, or strategic partnerships with established and well-financed entities. Competitors may also obtain more favorable supplier terms, invest more heavily in marketing and promotional activities, implement aggressive pricing or inventory strategies, and allocate greater resources to website, mobile app, and systems development. Failure to effectively compete or adapt to changing user needs and industry standards could materially affect the company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. The fresh grocery e-commerce market is rapidly evolving, requiring continuous adaptation to shifting user preferences and market dynamics.