Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Cid Holdco Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cid Holdco Inc (DAIC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-90.22 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-30,415.17 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Cid Holdco Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-99.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Cid Holdco Inc ranks #130 of 165 companies by market capitalization in the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Cid Holdco Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

DAIC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Cid Holdco Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DAIC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DAIC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/DAIC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 1.3% year over year, combined, vs -90.2% for Cid Holdco Inc. Cid Holdco Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Cid Holdco Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Cid Holdco Inc - Yes Yes Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (14) 100% 77% 77% 21%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 29% 17% 17% 10%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Cid Holdco Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Cid Holdco Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Cid Holdco Inc's full market share breakdown »

DAIC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

DAIC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Cid Holdco Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
42.9%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(6 of 14)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 9)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Cid Holdco Inc -95.90 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (14) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cid Holdco Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

DAIC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

DAIC High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 18) Percent change over the selected range

DAIC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

DAIC Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Cid Holdco Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The asset, personnel, and material flow management industry is characterized by a fragmented competitive landscape, with vendors providing software and hardware solutions tailored to specific industry verticals or solution sets. Zebra Technologies Corporation is a market leader in tracking and AutoID systems, focusing on mobile computing, marking, tracking, and printing technologies. The healthcare sector features industry-specific competitors, primarily within the US market, with many devices manufactured in China. Technologies employed across the industry include UWB, BLE, LoRA, passive RFID, and barcode systems. Major automation and sensor companies such as Honeywell, Siemens, Rockwell Automation, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Omron, Sick, and Schneider Electric offer complementary hardware and software solutions. Enterprise software providers like Korber, SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, Blue Yonder, Infor, and Manhattan Associates may compete in certain applications but often serve as commercial partners. Infrastructure and integrator vendors, including IBM, Cisco, Juniper Networks, JMA, Sierra Wireless, Dell, Arista, and HPE, possess extensive infrastructure and software capabilities and compete for market share. Competitors identified in company filings include Arista, Blue Yonder, Cisco, Dell, Honeywell, HPE, IBM, Infor, JMA, Juniper Networks, Korber, Manhattan Associates, Microsoft, Mitsubishi, Omron, Oracle, Panasonic, Rockwell Automation, SAP, Schneider Electric, Sick, Siemens, Sierra Wireless, and Zebra Technologies Corporation.

Cid Holdco Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Sierra Wireless Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Arista Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
HPE Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Korber Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Oracle Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sick Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Dell Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
JMA Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Mitsubishi Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
SAP Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Zebra Technologies Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Blue Yonder Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
IBM Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Manhattan Associates Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Panasonic Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Siemens Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Honeywell Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Juniper Networks Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Omron Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Schneider Electric Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cisco Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Infor Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Microsoft Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Rockwell Automation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cid Holdco Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.