Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Caterpillar Financial Services's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Caterpillar Financial Services (CATFFF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
10.23 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
14.63 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Caterpillar Financial Services vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,813M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Caterpillar Financial Services accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CATFFF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Caterpillar Financial Services generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CATFFF/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CATFFF/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CATFFF/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs 10.2% for Caterpillar Financial Services. Caterpillar Financial Services's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.17% to 0.17%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.

Caterpillar Financial Services's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation Yes Yes Yes Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (1) - - - 100%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Caterpillar Financial Services100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Caterpillar Financial Services and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Caterpillar Financial Services's full market share breakdown »

CATFFF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CATFFF Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

CATFFF Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

CATFFF High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

Caterpillar Financial Services's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive market for financing users of Caterpillar equipment and services. Its competitors include commercial banks and finance and leasing companies such as Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Inc., Banc of America Leasing & Capital LLC, BNP Paribas Leasing Solutions Limited, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, and Société Générale S.A. Additionally, manufacturers competing with Caterpillar have financial subsidiaries, including John Deere Capital Corporation, Komatsu Financial L.P., Volvo Financial Services, and Kubota Credit Corporation, which offer below-market interest rate programs funded by the manufacturers to support equipment sales. The company works with Caterpillar to provide financial merchandising programs globally.

Caterpillar Financial Services's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Société Générale S.A. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
John Deere Capital Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Komatsu Financial L.P. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Volvo Financial Services Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Societe General Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Kubota Credit Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
BNP Paribas Leasing Solutions Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Caterpillar Financial Services's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Caterpillar Financial Services's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation North America Operating 58.50 % EAME Operating 10.88 % Mining Reportable 10.24 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).