Boston Properties Ltd Partnership's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Boston Properties Ltd Partnership (BPLP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Boston Properties Ltd Partnership vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,480M vs -M combined for its competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Boston Properties Ltd Partnership accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BPLP Sales vs. its Competitors, 2015
Boston Properties Ltd Partnership generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
For context: the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry grew revenue -1.0% year over year, combined, vs 1.8% for Boston Properties Ltd Partnership. Boston Properties Ltd Partnership's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.82% to 0.85%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Boston Properties Ltd Partnership's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Properties Ltd Partnership | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.