Bona Film Group Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bona Film Group Ltd (BONA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Bona Film Group Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 254M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Bona Film Group Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BONA Sales vs. its Competitors, 2014
Bona Film Group Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Movies and Entertainment industry grew revenue 15.2% year over year, combined, vs 70.1% for Bona Film Group Ltd. Bona Film Group Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.73% to 1.08%, a gain of 0.35 percentage points.
Bona Film Group Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bona Film Group Ltd | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.