Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Rogers's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Rogers (ROG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2026
Competitors Tracked
1
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
5.25 %
Q1 2026
Net Margin
2.24 %
Q1 2026

Key Findings: Rogers vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 821M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-2.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Rogers ranks #10 of 21 companies by market capitalization in the Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber industry, holding 2.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Rogers accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.27M compares with $0.26M for the peer group (1.1x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ROG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026

Rogers generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ROG/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ROG/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ROG/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber industry grew revenue -4.6% year over year, combined, vs 5.3% for Rogers. Rogers's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.43% to 0.48%, a gain of 0.04 percentage points.

Rogers's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Rogers Corp No Yes No No
Competitors combined (1) 0% 0% 0% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 80% 67% 56% 11%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 42.90 % (3 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2026

100%market share
  • Rogers100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Rogers and its 1 tracked competitors.

See Rogers's full market share breakdown »

ROG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ROG Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Rogers's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(0 of 1)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(4 of 10)
33.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 6)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Rogers Corp 74.50 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (1) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rogers's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ROG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

ROG Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

ROG Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

ROG Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Farmer Brothers Co 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rogers's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Rogers's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

We compete primarily with manufacturers of high-end materials, some of which are large, multi-national companies, principally on the basis of innovation, customer relationships, product quality and performance, technical service, breadth of product line, and manufacturing capabilities. We also compete with manufacturers of commodity materials, including smaller regional producers with lower overhead costs and profit requirements located in Asia that attempt to upsell their products based principally upon price, particularly for products that have matured in their life cycle. We believe that we have a competitive advantage because of our reputation for innovation, the quality and reliability of our materials and components and our demonstrated commitment to technical support and customer service.

Publicly Traded Peers of Rogers Corp

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Rogers Corp 2,474.41 820.80 -55.90 3,000
Farmer Brothers Co 27.74 337.46 -18.62 1,300
SUBTOTAL 2,502.14 1,158.26 -74.51 4,300

Sources: Rogers Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Rogers Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Rogers's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Farmer Brothers Co Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Rogers's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Rogers's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Rogers Corp Advanced Electronics Solutions 53.75 % Advanced Connectivity Solutions 53.75 % Elastomeric Material Solutions 44.08 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Rogers's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Rogers Corp 2,474 273,600 -18,633
Farmer Brothers Co 28 259,582 -14,319
PEERS TOTAL 28 259,582 -14,319

Rogers's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Rogers Corp China 30.13 % United States 28.40 % Other EMEA 19.58 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Rogers's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 20 companies in Rogers's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Rogers ranks #10 of 20 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 2.06 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,219, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Entegris Inc 23,137 19.48 %
2 Dow Inc 20,114 16.94 %
3 Dupont De Nemours Inc 17,918 15.09 %
4 Albemarle Corporation 14,628 12.32 %
5 Aptargroup inc 1,234 5.2%
6 Eastman Chemical Co 1,234 5.2%
7 Armstrong World Industries Inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Hexcel Corporation 1,234 5.2%
9 Avient Corporation 1,234 5.2%
10 Rogers Corp 2,446 2.06 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Rogers's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.

Rogers's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
5 Aptargroup inc 7,991 -5.32 % -2.46 % 0.61 -0.48
6 Eastman Chemical Co 7,664 7.62 % -4.18 % 1.04 0.26
7 Armstrong World Industries Inc 7,035 -15.29 % 2.67 % 0.89 -0.57
8 Hexcel Corporation 6,437 40.17 % -13.81 % 1.03 0.84
9 Avient Corporation 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
10 Rogers Corp 2,446 74.53 % -4.27 % 1.28 1.44
11 Newell Brands Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
12 Myers Industries Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
13 Karat Packaging Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
14 Purecycle Technologies Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
15 Latham Group Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Rogers's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Rogers's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (34 companies). See the full Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 32.21 % 21.52 % (avg) +10.7 pp
Operating Margin -4.14 % industry median -10.7 pp
EBITDA Margin 2.77 % 7.78 % (avg) -5.0 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 3.07 % 7.65 % (avg) -4.6 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Rogers's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber industry average (34 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E - 36.4x -
EV / EBITDA 79.3x 17.8x +61.5x
P/B 1.7x 2.5x -0.9x
Return on Equity -4.66 % industry aggregate -1.25 %
Return on Invested Capital -1.38 % 5.99 % (avg) -7.37 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Rogers's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20182019202020212022202320242025
Revenue Growth 7.07 %2.18 %-10.65 %16.24 %4.10 %-6.49 %-8.59 %-2.33 %
Operating Margin 12.82 %12.30 %8.39 %12.56 %14.87 %9.39 %3.00 %-5.55 %
Return on Invested Capital 5.85 %5.26 %2.96 %4.89 %5.54 %3.28 %0.96 %-1.80 %
P/E 24.2x51.7x57.2x47.2x19.4x41.4x72.3x-

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Rogers's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Rogers's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Rogers is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)AVNTSWIMCMTSHLMNWLFARMDOWRogersAFI

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Rogers's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Relative market share (vs Rogers's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Rogers

Rogers falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.11x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.2% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Rogers's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 1,219 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.07 % vs industry average 7.65 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Rogers's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Rogers's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Rogers's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest Rogers

Rogers falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Rogers's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.

Weaknesses

  • Operating margin 10.7 points below the industry median.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-2.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.11x).

Opportunities

  • A meaningful share of tracked competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Rogers's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Rogers Corp 1.39 3.91 - 0.57
Farmer Brothers Co 0.07 1.25 0.49 2.13

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Rogers's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Rogers CorpQ1 2026+5.2 %-0.5 %--2.2 %
Farmer Brothers CoQ4 2025-1.7 %+8.4 %--
PEERS TOTAL+3.0 %+2.1 %--

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Rogers's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Rogers CorpQ1 2026+1.8 %-1.5 %-51.0 %0.0 %
Farmer Brothers CoQ4 2025+9.8 %+14.3 %-9.9 %-5.3 %

Rogers's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Rogers Corp---5.864.07
Farmer Brothers Co---13.703.89

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Rogers's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Rogers Corp-3.01-122.502.07
Farmer Brothers Co-0.08--0.78
PEERS AVERAGE-2.16132.882.04

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.