Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Western Capital Resources Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Western Capital Resources Inc (WCRS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q1 2022
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
5.13 %
Q1 2022
Net Margin
10.64 %
Q1 2022

Key Findings: Western Capital Resources Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 171M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+8.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Western Capital Resources Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

WCRS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022

Western Capital Resources Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/WCRS/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/WCRS/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/WCRS/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Specialty Retail industry grew revenue 19.7% year over year, combined, vs 5.1% for Western Capital Resources Inc. Western Capital Resources Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Western Capital Resources Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Western Capital Resources Inc Yes Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 100% 100% 100% 25%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q1 2022

100%market share
  • Western Capital Resources Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Western Capital Resources Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Western Capital Resources Inc's full market share breakdown »

WCRS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

WCRS Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Western Capital Resources Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
25%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 4)
37.5%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 8)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Western Capital Resources Inc 33.50 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Western Capital Resources Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

WCRS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

WCRS High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 6) Percent change over the selected range

WCRS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

WCRS Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Western Capital Resources Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The franchise business model has grown in popularity over the past several decades. Franchising provides a small business owner with the opportunity to independently own and operate a business selling brand-name products or providing established services yet enjoy widespread support from the franchisor.

There is substantial and ever increasing competition in the wireless phone industry where customers can choose between many other postpaid and no-contract resellers, including AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile/Metro PCS and a larger number of regional providers. We compete for customers based principally on Cricket’s service/device offerings, price, call quality and coverage area.

Competition for the no-contract customers, the sub-industry in which we operate, continues to grow. Other significant no-contract carriers include MetroPCS, Virgin Mobile and Boost Mobile. There is also competition with other no-contract phone service providers such as Straight Talk by Wal-Mart or Wal-Mart’s Family Mobile powered by T-Mobile, an increase of national retailers offering similar or identical products and services that we provide, such as Cricket phones sold at Game Stop and Wal-Mart, and an increase in mobile virtual network operator (“MVNO”) offerings.

Our Cricket store business also competes with other actual or potential authorized sellers and distributors of Cricket products and services. The authorization to sell Cricket products and services is granted by Cricket Wireless, LLC, a wholly owned entity of Leap Wireless International, Inc. On March 13, 2014, Leap Wireless International was acquired by AT&T. Presently, we believe that our ability to compete with other sellers of Cricket products and services will depend on the success with which we operate our current store locations. If we successfully manage those stores and are able to develop and maintain a strong working relationship with Cricket, we expect that we may be able to effectively compete for additional store authorizations when and as they come available.

In the retail garden business, within the bare root rose category, we compete against brick and mortar garden centers and nurseries (approximately 10,000 across the United States), as well as other online and mail-order retailers, including David Austin Roses and Regan Nursery. Across other plant categories, we compete against Gardens Alive and their portfolio of brands, and other competitors. Our biggest competitive advantages are our recognizable Jackson & Perkins brand name and its proprietary patented rose varieties. The most direct competitor for Wayside Gardens is White Flower Farms, which also focuses on high-end, premium plants.

Within the holiday gift segment, we compete against larger competitors including Harry and David and 1-800 Flowers, among others. Within the seed business, our primary competitor is Burpee which, in addition to having an online presence, supplies seed products to mass market retailers, including Wal-Mart.

Our Van Dyke’s Restorers brand competes primarily with other online retailers since brick and mortar stores cannot afford to carry Van Dyke’s breadth of SKUs. Our competitors are Signature Hardware, House of Antique Hardware, and Rejuvenation Hardware (part of Williams Sonoma). The above-mentioned competitors compete primarily in the hardware, lighting and kitchen and bath categories. The decorative wood portion of the Van Dyke’s business is in a very fragmented industry niche and there are no big decorative wood competitors. Van Dyke’s competes primarily through the breadth of its product variety as well as through its established brand name and customer list.

Like most other payday lenders, we believe that the primary competitive factors in our business are location and customer service. We face intense competition in an industry with relatively low barriers to entry, and we believe that the payday lending markets are becoming more competitive as the industry matures and consolidates. We compete with other payday lending and check cashing stores, and with financial service entities and retail businesses that offer payday loans or similar financial services. For example, we consider credit card companies that offer payday features, credit unions, banks that offer small loans, and creditors and loan services that can extend payment terms on outstanding loans to be our competitors. In addition, we compete in part with services offered by traditional financial institutions, most particularly with respect to the “overdraft protection” services those institutions may offer and the charges they levy for checks written with insufficient funds.

Additional areas of competition have arisen. Businesses offer loans over the Internet as well as “loans by phone,” and these services compete with the services we offer. There also has been increasing penetration of electronic banking and related services into the check cashing and money transfer industry, including direct deposit of payroll checks, payroll or debit cards, stored-value cards, prepaid credit and debit cards, and electronic transfer of government benefits.

Our competitors for pawn store merchandise sales include numerous retail and wholesale stores, including jewelry stores, discount retail stores, consumer electronics stores, other pawn stores, other resale stores, electronic commerce retailers and auction sites.

The pawn industry in the United States is large and highly fragmented. The industry consists of approximately 13,000 pawn stores owned primarily by independent operators who own one to three locations. We consider the industry relatively mature. The three largest pawn store operators account for approximately 10% of the total estimated pawn stores in the United States.

Western Capital Resources Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Metro Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
T-Mobile/Sprint/Metro Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Metro Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Game Stop Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Straight Talk by Wal-Mart Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Wal-Mart Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Boost Mobile Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Regan Nursery Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Verizon Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
AT&T Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Gardens Alive Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
T-Mobile/Metro Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Wal-Mart’s Family Mobile powered by T-Mobile Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
David Austin Roses Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Straight Talk Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Virgin Mobile Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Best Buy Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Western Capital Resources Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Western Capital Resources Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Western Capital Resources Inc Cellular Retail Stores 56.53 % Direct to Consumer 34.40 % Manufacturing 5.64 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).