Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

T-rex Acquisition's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of T-rex Acquisition (TRXA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-91.46 %
Q3 2026
Net Margin
-167,000.00 %
Q3 2026

Key Findings: T-rex Acquisition vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-92.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: T-rex Acquisition accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

TRXA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026

T-rex Acquisition generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/TRXA/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/TRXA/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/TRXA/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Miscellaneous Financial Services industry grew revenue 293.3% year over year, combined, vs -91.5% for T-rex Acquisition. T-rex Acquisition's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

T-rex Acquisition's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
T-REX Acquisition Corp. No - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 0% 100% 100% 0%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2026

100%market share
  • T-rex Acquisition100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of T-rex Acquisition and its 0 tracked competitors.

See T-rex Acquisition's full market share breakdown »

TRXA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

TRXA Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

T-rex Acquisition's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
66.7%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(2 of 3)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
T-REX Acquisition Corp. - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for T-rex Acquisition's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

TRXA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

TRXA High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

T-rex Acquisition's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The cryptocurrency mining industry is characterized by intense competition among both established and emerging companies, including publicly traded and private firms with greater financial resources, longer operating histories, and improved access to capital. Competitors benefit from economies of scale and invest significantly in technology, infrastructure, and research and development, which enhances operational efficiency, reduces costs for mining equipment and energy, and improves resilience to cryptocurrency price fluctuations. Some competitors possess greater liquidity and access to capital markets, enabling rapid expansion and responsiveness to market changes. Principal competitors identified include publicly traded Bitcoin miners such as Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc., Riot Platforms, Inc., CleanSpark, Inc., Hut 8 Mining Corp., Hive Blockchain Technologies, LTD., and Iris Energy Limited. The company may encounter challenges in maintaining or increasing market share and could face disadvantages related to pricing, energy costs, and access to high-performance mining hardware. Competition for mining equipment and low-cost energy sources is expected to intensify, which may affect profitability.

T-rex Acquisition's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
CleanSpark, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Riot Platforms, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Iris Energy Limited Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hive Blockchain Technologies, LTD. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hut 8 Mining Corp. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for T-rex Acquisition's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License