Summer Infant Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Summer Infant Inc (SUMR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Summer Infant Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 142M vs 122,587M combined for tracked competitors (0.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-9.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Summer Infant Inc generated -5.0% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2022, vs 14.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -11.4% net margin compares with 14.6% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Summer Infant Inc accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.72M compares with $0.58M for the peer group (1.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SUMR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Summer Infant Inc reported revenue contraction of 5.02 % year on year in Q1 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 14.68 %.
With a net margin of -11.39 %, Summer Infant Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (14.57 %).
Summer Infant Inc generated 0.12 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.15 % a year earlier.
Summer Infant Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Summer Infant Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Summer Infant Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry grew revenue 9.7% year over year, combined, vs -5.0% for Summer Infant Inc. Summer Infant Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.05% to 0.04%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Summer Infant Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 42.90 % (3 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SUMR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SUMR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SUMR Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Interparfums Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Church and Dwight Co Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Newell Brands Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Dole Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Summer Infant Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Summer Infant Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The primary methods of competition in the industry consist of product innovation, brand positioning, quality, price, and timely distribution. Our competitive strengths include our ability to develop innovative new products, brand awareness, our relationships with major retailers, and the quality and pricing of our products.
Publicly Traded Peers of Summer Infant inc.
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | 25.96 | 141.85 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 361,061.51 | 87,032.00 |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | 22,776.68 | 6,228.60 |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | 4,584.70 | 4,392.00 |
| Mattel Inc | 3,854.33 | 5,489.72 |
| Interparfums Inc | 3,777.15 | 1,502.83 |
| SUBTOTAL | 399,706.20 | 179,292.34 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Summer Infant inc..
Sources: Summer Infant inc.'s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Summer Infant inc. versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Summer Infant Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Dorel Industries, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tomy Company, Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Interparfums Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Summer Infant Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Summer Infant Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Procter and Gamble Co | Fabric & Home Care 34.83 % |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | Consumer Domestic 75.54 % |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | Water Segment 55.74 % |
| Mattel Inc | North America 55.14 % |
| Interparfums Inc | European based operations 66.98 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Summer Infant Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | 26 | 720,036 | -35,904 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 361,062 | 836,846 | 155,231 |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | 22,777 | 1,122,270 | 134,198 |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | 4,585 | 439,200 | 14,880 |
| Mattel Inc | 3,854 | 177,088 | 13,786 |
| Interparfums Inc | 3,777 | 2,270,134 | 309,864 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 399,680 | 581,231 | 92,210 |
Summer Infant Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | US 94.15 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Non-US 52.05 % |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | US 83.64 % |
| Mattel Inc | North America 55.14 % |
| Interparfums Inc | North America 37.05 % |
| Newell Brands Inc | North America 67.20 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Summer Infant Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (50 companies). See the full Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.37 % | 31.31 % (avg) | -5.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | -4.56 % | industry median | +11.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -1.95 % | 5.28 % (avg) | -7.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.78 % | 4.37 % (avg) | -3.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Summer Infant Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry average (50 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 23.7x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 15.2x | - |
| P/B | 5.6x | 3.1x | +2.5x |
| Return on Equity | -180.38 % | industry aggregate | -198.17 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -11.00 % | 2.26 % (avg) | -13.26 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Summer Infant Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 1.31 % | 0.22 % | -3.14 % | -2.65 % | -11.61 % | 0.95 % | -10.33 % | -7.49 % |
| Operating Margin | 1.31 % | -4.25 % | -1.41 % | 1.49 % | -0.22 % | 1.04 % | 3.15 % | -1.61 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.35 % | -8.46 % | -7.21 % | 3.64 % | -0.56 % | 2.64 % | 10.22 % | -3.96 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Summer Infant Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Summer Infant Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Summer Infant Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Summer Infant Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.78 % vs industry average 4.37 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Summer Infant Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Summer Infant Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Summer Infant Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Summer Infant Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Summer Infant Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 11.0 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 198.2 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-3.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (40.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-9.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Summer Infant Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | 0.01 | 1.51 | 8.76 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 0.25 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | 0.26 | 1.13 | 0.53 |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | 0.23 | 1.98 | 1.11 |
| Mattel Inc | 0.56 | 1.89 | 1.09 |
| Interparfums Inc | 0.42 | 3.20 | 0.15 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Summer Infant Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | Q1 2022 | -5.0 % | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q2 2026 | +1.5 % | -15.0 % |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.6 % | +6.2 % |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | Q2 2026 | -4.1 % | - |
| Mattel Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | - |
| Interparfums Inc | Q2 2026 | +2.4 % | -10.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -11.3 % | +29.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Summer Infant Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | Q1 2022 | +6.1 % | -77.0 % |
| Procter and Gamble Co | Q2 2026 | +2.7 % | +2.7 % |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.7 % | +32.9 % |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | Q2 2026 | -14.7 % | -23.5 % |
| Mattel Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.9 % | +82.3 % |
| Interparfums Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.9 % | -88.0 % |
Summer Infant Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | - | - | - |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 12.72% | 17.81% | 30.05% |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | 8.24% | 8.83% | 17.78% |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | 2.30% | 2.56% | 6.31% |
| Mattel Inc | 6.60% | 8.94% | 19.88% |
| Interparfums Inc | 13.27% | 13.98% | 18.60% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Summer Infant Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Summer Infant inc. | - | 0.18 |
| Procter and Gamble Co | 22.62 | 4.15 |
| Church and Dwight Co Inc | 30.85 | 3.66 |
| Fortune Brands Innovations Inc | 31.24 | 1.04 |
| Mattel Inc | 9.88 | 0.70 |
| Interparfums Inc | 22.59 | 2.51 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 14.07 | 2.23 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.