Regional Brands Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Regional Brands Inc (RGBD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Regional Brands Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 40M vs 8,650M combined for tracked competitors (0.5% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-14.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-71.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Profitability: Its 8.4% net margin compares with 3.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Regional Brands Inc accounted for 1.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
RGBD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2017
With a net margin of 8.44 %, Regional Brands Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (2.97 %).
Regional Brands Inc generated 1.39 % of the combined sales of its peer group.
Regional Brands Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2017
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Regional Brands Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Regional Brands Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Regional Brands Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (3) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
RGBD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
RGBD Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Perfect Moment Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Regional Brands Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Regional Brands Inc.
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | 22.69 | 40.12 |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 3,855.15 | 8,619.37 |
| Cimg Inc | 60.53 | 31.00 |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | 6.07 | 23.28 |
| SUBTOTAL | 3,944.44 | 8,713.77 |
Sources: Regional Brands Inc.'s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Regional Brands Inc. versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Regional Brands Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cimg Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Regional Brands Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Regional Brands Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | Refining 97.19 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Regional Brands Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | 23 | - | - |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 3,855 | 4,902,943 | 481,866 |
| Cimg Inc | 61 | 2,384,246 | -3,635,185 |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | 6 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 3,922 | 4,897,600 | 447,780 |
Regional Brands Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Perfect Moment Ltd | Europe 43.74 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Regional Brands Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Forestry & Wood Products industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (23 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.45 % | 21.21 % (avg) | +7.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 2.63 % | industry median | +115.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.40 % | -3.94 % (avg) | +10.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.21 % | 5.28 % (avg) | -4.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Regional Brands Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Regional Brands Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Regional Brands Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Regional Brands Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.21 % vs industry average 5.28 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Regional Brands Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Regional Brands Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Regional Brands Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Regional Brands Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Regional Brands Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 115.2 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 89.3 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-14.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (66.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-71.8% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Regional Brands Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | 0.71 | 2.63 | 0.13 |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 0.13 | 1.65 | 0.54 |
| Cimg Inc | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.03 |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | 0.27 | 1.26 | 25.82 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Regional Brands Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | Q3 2017 | +11.4 % | +51.4 % |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +56.8 % | +678.6 % |
| Cimg Inc | Q2 2026 | +3,426.1 % | - |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | Q2 2026 | -21.9 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +56.6 % | +723.6 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Regional Brands Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | Q3 2017 | +10.6 % | -31.0 % |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +33.2 % | -17.5 % |
| Cimg Inc | Q2 2026 | +3,745.8 % | - |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | Q2 2026 | -10.3 % | - |
Regional Brands Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | 2.66% | 3.65% | 4.21% |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 20.35% | 26.96% | 52.90% |
| Cimg Inc | - | - | - |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Regional Brands Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Brands Inc. | 36.71 | 0.57 |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | 4.55 | 0.45 |
| Cimg Inc | - | 1.95 |
| Perfect Moment Ltd | - | 0.26 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 4.97 | 0.45 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.