Centrus Energy's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Centrus Energy (LEU) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Centrus Energy vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 474M vs 51,435M combined for tracked competitors (0.9% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+48.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+6.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Centrus Energy generated 14.0% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 22.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 9.5% net margin compares with 17.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: Centrus Energy ranks #13 of 37 companies by market capitalization in the Construction Raw Materials industry, holding 1.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Centrus Energy accounted for 1.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 1.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.01M compares with $0.88M for the peer group (1.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LEU Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Centrus Energy reported revenue growth of 13.98 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 22.40 %.
With a net margin of 9.54 %, Centrus Energy reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.35 %).
Centrus Energy generated 1.27 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 1.36 % a year earlier.
Centrus Energy vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Centrus Energy and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Centrus Energy's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 11.9% year over year, combined, vs 14.0% for Centrus Energy. Centrus Energy's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.21% to 0.22%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Centrus Energy's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LEU Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LEU Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LEU Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | General Electric Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Centrus Energy's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Centrus Energy's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Rosatom, a Russian government entity, which sells LEU through its wholly owned
subsidiary TENEX;
Urenco, a consortium of companies owned or controlled by the British and Dutch
governments and by two German utilities; and
Areva, a company largely owned by the French government.
Urenco reported installed capacity at its European and U.S. enrichment facilities
of 19.1 million SWU per year at the end of 2015. Urenco has announced plans
to continue a slow expansion at its Urenco USA facility with a target of adding
an additional 1 million SWU by 2022.
Areva’s gas centrifuge enrichment plant in France began commercial operations in 2011 and more than 96% of the plant’s nominal capacity of 7.5 million SWU was reported to be in service at the end of 2015. Areva has announced that it will reach its full capacity of 7.5 million SWU per year by the end of 2016. In October 2011, the NRC issued an operating license to Areva for the Eagle Rock plant near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Areva’s original plan called for initial production in 2014 but Areva has placed its plans for the Eagle Rock plant on hold. Furthermore, under a new strategic plan, Areva suspended planned capacity expansions for its domestic gas centrifuge plant beyond 7.5 million SWU.
The production capacity for Rosatom/TENEX is estimated by the World Nuclear Association (“WNA”) to be approximately 27 million SWU per year. Imports of LEU and other uranium products produced in the Russian Federation are subject to the restrictions described below under Limitations on Imports of LEU from Russia.
All of our current competitors are owned or controlled, in whole or in part, by foreign governments. These competitors may make business decisions in both domestic and international markets that are influenced by political or economic policy considerations rather than exclusively by commercial considerations.
There are also producers of LEU in China, Japan and Brazil that primarily serve a portion of their respective domestic markets. China is emerging as a growing producer and has begun to supply limited quantities of LEU to foreign markets. China’s commercial SWU production capacity is estimated to be in the range of 4.5 to 4.8 million SWU per year at the end of 2015. Additional capacity is also under construction at the existing enrichment plants, which is expected to add an additional 3.0 million SWU per year by 2017, in order to meet Chinese internal SWU requirements.
In addition, GE Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment (“GLE”) has an agreement with Silex Systems Limited, an Australian company, to license Silex’s laser enrichment technology. The NRC issued GLE a license in September 2012 for a proposed plant in Wilmington, North Carolina. More recently GLE has expressed an interest in deploying enrichment capacity at the site of the Paducah GDP. In recent quarters, sponsors of the GLE consortium have written off their investment in the project, and the GLE project staff has been significantly reduced. All GLE activities at the Oak Ridge, Tennessee facility have been shut down, but work continues at the Wilmington Test Loop facility.
LEU may also be produced by down-blending government stockpiles of highly enriched uranium. Governments control the timing and availability of highly enriched uranium released for this purpose, and the release of this material to the market could impact market conditions. Given the current oversupplied nuclear fuel market, any additional LEU from down-blended highly enriched uranium released into the market would have a negative effect on prices for LEU.
LEU that we supply to foreign customers is exported under the terms of international
agreements governing nuclear cooperation between the United States and the country
of destination or other entities, such as the European Union or the International
Atomic Energy Agency. The LEU supplied to us under the Russian Supply Agreement
is subject to the terms of cooperation agreements between the Russian Federation
and the country of destination or other entities.
Publicly Traded Peers of Centrus Energy Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | 3,124.94 | 473.90 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197.28 | 50,638.00 |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | 888.45 | 796.56 |
| SUBTOTAL | 337,210.67 | 51,908.46 |
Sources: Centrus Energy Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Centrus Energy Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Centrus Energy's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cascade Bancorp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Centrus Energy's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Centrus Energy's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | 3,125 | 1,014,775 | 103,854 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197 | 888,386 | 157,579 |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | 888 | 482,762 | -11,132 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 334,086 | 876,975 | 152,833 |
Centrus Energy's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | B&W 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Centrus Energy's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 35 companies in Centrus Energy's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Centrus Energy ranks #13 of 35 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.11 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,077, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crh Public Limited Company | 55,230 | 19.59 % |
| 2 | Cemex Sab De Cv | 42,459 | 15.06 % |
| 3 | Vulcan Materials Company | 32,022 | 11.36 % |
| 4 | Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,236 | 10.37 % |
| 5 | Teck Resources Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Amrize Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Chemical and Mining Co Of Chile Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | James Hardie Industries Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hecla Mining Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Eagle Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 13 | Centrus Energy Corp | 3,125 | 1.11 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Centrus Energy's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Centrus Energy's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | James Hardie Industries Plc | 14,917 | 37.33 % |
| 9 | Hecla Mining Company | 11,622 | 49.13 % |
| 10 | Eagle Materials Inc | 5,499 | -22.37 % |
| 11 | Mdu Resources Group Inc | 3,930 | 8.82 % |
| 12 | United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Centrus Energy Corp | 3,125 | -54.27 % |
| 14 | Knife River Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Elevra Lithium Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Energy Fuels Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Titan America Sa | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Tecnoglass Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Centrus Energy's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Centrus Energy's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Construction Raw Materials industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (45 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.65 % | 29.19 % (avg) | -5.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | 1.56 % | industry median | -10.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 14.75 % | 8.38 % (avg) | +6.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 22.96 % | 12.01 % (avg) | +10.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Centrus Energy's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Construction Raw Materials industry average (45 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 76.6x | 26.6x | +50.0x |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.8x | 14.0x | +31.8x |
| P/B | 5.6x | 2.6x | +3.0x |
| Return on Equity | 7.06 % | industry aggregate | -7.46 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.28 % | 0.69 % (avg) | -0.41 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Centrus Energy's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -11.63 % | 8.65 % | 17.88 % | 20.67 % | -1.51 % | 8.95 % | 38.08 % | 1.52 % |
| Operating Margin | -47.88 % | -9.39 % | 20.63 % | 22.90 % | 20.32 % | 16.37 % | 10.86 % | 11.19 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 101.29 % | 8.53 % | -30.50 % | -90.82 % | 35.38 % | 15.93 % | 9.72 % | 2.91 % |
| P/E | - | - | 23.5x | 5.9x | 11.2x | 10.1x | 17.7x | 64.7x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Centrus Energy's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Centrus Energy's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Centrus Energy is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Centrus Energy's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Centrus Energy's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Centrus Energy falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.06x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Centrus Energy's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,077 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 22.96 % vs industry average 12.01 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Centrus Energy's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Centrus Energy's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Centrus Energy's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Centrus Energy falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Centrus Energy's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+48.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 10.5 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 7.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.06x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Centrus Energy's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | 3.90 | 4.86 | 1.71 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.86 | 1.09 |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | 0.19 | 1.22 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Centrus Energy's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | +14.0 % | -41.9 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +16.6 % |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | Q2 2026 | +121.9 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +22.3 % | +19.9 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Centrus Energy's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | +25.4 % | +1,888.9 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +540.9 % | +2.4 % |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | Q2 2026 | +180.4 % | +140.9 % |
Centrus Energy's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | 2.01% | 2.50% | 7.06% |
| General Electric Company | 6.98% | 11.25% | 48.50% |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Centrus Energy's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Centrus Energy Corp | 62.07 | 6.59 |
| General Electric Company | 37.57 | 6.58 |
| Babcock and Wilcox Enterprises Inc | - | 1.12 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 37.42 | 6.50 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
