Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Marketaxess Holdings Inc (MKTX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Marketaxess Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 872M vs 44,876M combined for tracked competitors (1.9% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+8.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Marketaxess Holdings Inc generated -0.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 12.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 31.3% net margin compares with 31.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Marketaxess Holdings Inc ranks #41 of 91 companies by market capitalization in the Investment Services industry, holding 0.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Marketaxess Holdings Inc accounted for 1.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 2.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.00M compares with $0.57M for the peer group (1.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MKTX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Marketaxess Holdings Inc reported revenue contraction of 0.55 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.88 %.
With a net margin of 31.28 %, Marketaxess Holdings Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (31.84 %).
Marketaxess Holdings Inc generated 1.77 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 2.00 % a year earlier.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Marketaxess Holdings Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Marketaxess Holdings Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Investment Services industry grew revenue -2.0% year over year, combined, vs -0.6% for Marketaxess Holdings Inc. Marketaxess Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.09% to 0.09%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (9) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MKTX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MKTX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MKTX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
MKTX Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bgc Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Nasdaq Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Cboe Global Markets Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Value Line Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Cme Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Marketaxess Holdings Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The industry that we participate in is highly competitive and we expect competition
to intensify in the future. We face four main areas of competition:
·
Telephone and Direct Electronic Communications — We compete with bond
trading business conducted over the telephone, e-mail or instant messaging between
broker-dealers and their institutional investor clients. Institutional investors
have historically purchased fixed-income securities by telephoning or otherwise
communicating via e-mail or instant messaging with bond sales professionals
at one or more broker-dealers and inquiring about the price and availability
of individual bonds. This remains the manner in which the majority of corporate
bonds are still traded between institutional investors and broker-dealers.
·
Other electronic trading platforms — There are numerous other electronic
trading platforms currently in existence, including several that have only commenced,
or announced an intention to launch, operations in the last twelve months. Among
others, Bloomberg and TradeWeb operate- multi-dealer to institutional investor
trading platforms for both fixed-income securities and derivatives. The New
York Stock Exchange also offers exchange-style trading for corporate bonds.
In addition, some broker-dealers and institutional investors operate proprietary
electronic trading systems that enable institutional investors to trade directly
with a broker-dealer, and/or with other institutional investors over an electronic
medium. As we expand our business into new products, we will likely come into
more direct competition with other electronic trading platforms or firms offering
traditional services.
·
Market data and information vendors — Several large market data and information
providers currently have a data and analytics relationship with virtually every
institutional firm. Some of these entities, including Bloomberg, currently offer
varying forms of electronic trading of fixed-income securities, mostly on a
single-dealer basis. Some of these entities have announced their intention to
expand their electronic trading platforms or to develop new platforms. These
entities are currently direct competitors to our information services business
and already are or may in the future become direct competitors to our electronic
trading platform.
Other approved regulatory mechanisms — We compete with other approved
regulatory mechanisms in Europe that have the FCA’s ARM designation and
provide post-trade matching and regulatory transaction reporting services, including
the London Stock Exchange’s UnaVista.
Competitors, including companies in which some of our clients have invested,
have developed electronic trading platforms or have announced their intention
to explore the development of electronic trading platforms that compete or will
compete with us. Furthermore, some of our clients have made, and may in the
future continue to make, investments in or enter into agreements with other
businesses that directly or indirectly compete with us.
In general, we compete on the basis of a number of key factors, including:
broad network of broker-dealer and institutional investor clients using our
electronic trading platform;
liquidity provided by the participating broker-dealers and, to a growing extent,
by other institutional investors;
magnitude and frequency of price improvement;
enhancing the quality and speed of execution;
compliance benefits;
total transaction costs;
technology capabilities, including the reliability and ease of use of our electronic
trading platform; and
range of products, protocols and services offered.
We believe that our ability to grow volumes and revenues will largely depend
on our performance with respect to these factors.
Our competitive position is also enhanced by the familiarity and integration
of our broker-dealer and institutional investor clients with our electronic
trading platform and other systems. We have focused on the unique aspects of
the credit markets we serve in the development of our platform, working closely
with our clients to provide a system that is suited to their needs.
Our broker-dealer clients have invested in building API’s with us for
inventory contributions, electronic trading, government bond benchmark pricing
and post-trade messaging. We believe that we have successfully built deep roots
with our broker-dealer clients, increasing our level of service to them while
at the same time increasing their commitment to our services.
Furthermore, a significant number of our institutional investor firms have built
interfaces to enable them to communicate electronically between our platform
and their order, portfolio management and accounting systems. We believe that
this increases the reliance of these institutional investor firms on our services
and creates significant competitive barriers to entry.
Publicly Traded Peers of Marketaxess Holdings Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 5,782.15 | 871.79 |
| Cme Group Inc | 96,635.71 | 6,772.60 |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 87,696.04 | 13,505.00 |
| Moody s Corporation | 80,825.78 | 8,183.00 |
| Nasdaq Inc | 52,437.41 | 8,751.00 |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | 27,018.04 | 5,061.30 |
| SUBTOTAL | 370,982.41 | 49,805.90 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
Sources: Marketaxess Holdings Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Marketaxess Holdings Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| The Wall Street Journal | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tradeweb Markets Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bgc Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Marketaxess Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 5,782 | 1,004,368 | 353,798 |
| Cme Group Inc | 96,636 | 1,747,768 | 1,103,071 |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 87,696 | 1,051,464 | 319,215 |
| Moody s Corporation | 80,826 | 509,020 | 174,048 |
| Nasdaq Inc | 52,437 | 340,784 | 76,561 |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | 27,018 | 3,047,140 | 811,981 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 365,200 | 574,250 | 176,674 |
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | US 64.79 % |
| Moody s Corporation | United States 55.74 % |
| Nasdaq Inc | United States 75.24 % |
| Morningstar inc | United States 72.24 % |
| Clearwater Analytics Holdings Inc | United States 73.62 % |
| Bgc Group Inc | EMEA 53.51 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | Exchanges 66.94 % |
| Moody s Corporation | Rating Revenue 57.12 % |
| Nasdaq Inc | Market Services 54.19 % |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | Options 51.50 % |
| Morningstar inc | Morningstar Data and Analytics 33.49 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 88 companies in Marketaxess Holdings Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Marketaxess Holdings Inc ranks #41 of 88 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.25 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 607, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan Stanley | 305,186 | 13.29 % |
| 2 | The Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 282,278 | 12.29 % |
| 3 | Blackrock Inc | 177,737 | 7.74 % |
| 4 | Schwab Charles Corp | 171,118 | 7.45 % |
| 5 | Futu Holdings Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Robinhood Markets Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Cme Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Blackstone Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Kkr and co inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 41 | Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 5,782 | 0.25 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Marketaxess Holdings Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | Stonex Group Inc | 8,205 | 6.59 % |
| 37 | Morningstar inc | 7,337 | -16.90 % |
| 38 | Victory Capital Holdings Inc | 6,832 | 66.55 % |
| 39 | Pjt Partners Inc | 6,443 | -17.83 % |
| 40 | Blue Owl Capital Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 41 | Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 5,782 | -7.91 % |
| 42 | Bgc Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 43 | Marex Group Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 44 | Ha Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 45 | Piper Sandler Companies | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 46 | Galaxy Digital Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Marketaxess Holdings Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Investment Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (78 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 61.67 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | 45.71 % | industry median | +9.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 54.63 % | 19.52 % (avg) | +35.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 6.62 % | 2.93 % (avg) | +3.7 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Investment Services industry average (78 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 14.9x | 23.9x | -8.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.4x | 12.8x | -4.4x |
| P/B | 3.6x | 3.0x | +0.6x |
| Return on Equity | 24.80 % | industry aggregate | 8.96 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 12.67 % | 8.46 % (avg) | 4.21 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 8.45 % | 19.25 % | 33.14 % | 1.13 % | 2.87 % | 4.71 % | 8.66 % | 3.67 % |
| Operating Margin | 50.47 % | 26.26 % | 55.96 % | 50.33 % | 49.83 % | 45.62 % | 45.32 % | 45.72 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 18.78 % | 9.67 % | 21.09 % | 15.09 % | 14.13 % | 11.68 % | 11.54 % | 12.69 % |
| P/E | 46.9x | 69.3x | 69.4x | 56.2x | 43.3x | 37.5x | 33.3x | 25.9x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Marketaxess Holdings Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Marketaxess Holdings Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Marketaxess Holdings Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) — a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 607 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 6.62 % vs industry average 2.93 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Marketaxess Holdings Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Marketaxess Holdings Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) — not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 9.6 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 9.0 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (14.9x vs 23.9x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (33.30 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 1.74 | 2.08 | 0.11 |
| Cme Group Inc | 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.12 |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 0.02 | 0.95 | 0.68 |
| Moody s Corporation | 0.60 | 1.44 | 1.95 |
| Nasdaq Inc | 0.11 | 1.11 | 0.74 |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | 0.71 | 1.59 | 0.31 |
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | -0.6 % | -4.0 % |
| Cme Group Inc | Q2 2026 | +0.8 % | +2.9 % |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.7 % | +12.7 % |
| Moody s Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.1 % | +51.8 % |
| Nasdaq Inc | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +12.2 % |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | Q2 2026 | +23.0 % | +51.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +15.0 % | +19.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -5.6 % |
| Cme Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +28.3 % |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +56.9 % |
| Moody s Corporation | Q2 2026 | +5.9 % | +21.3 % |
| Nasdaq Inc | Q2 2026 | +29.8 % | +30.5 % |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | Q2 2026 | +21.4 % | +63.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 14.16% | 16.11% | 24.80% |
| Cme Group Inc | 2.19% | 3.58% | 15.54% |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 2.60% | 3.16% | 14.04% |
| Moody s Corporation | 18.45% | 21.89% | 76.52% |
| Nasdaq Inc | 6.76% | 7.29% | 16.28% |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | 13.47% | 18.06% | 25.66% |
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Marketaxess Holdings Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Marketaxess Holdings Inc | 19.42 | 6.63 |
| Cme Group Inc | 22.69 | 14.27 |
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc | 21.92 | 6.49 |
| Moody s Corporation | 29.41 | 9.88 |
| Nasdaq Inc | 26.94 | 5.99 |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc | 20.08 | 5.34 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 24.15 | 7.45 |
Sign in to see all peers for Marketaxess Holdings Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.