Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc (SWIOU) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 381M vs 108,212M combined for tracked competitors (0.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+10.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc generated 0.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2023, vs 0.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -4.8% net margin compares with 3.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc ranks #56 of 83 companies by market capitalization in the Chemical Manufacturing industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc accounted for 0.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.3% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
SWIOU Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2023
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc reported revenue growth of 0.37 % year on year in Q2 2023, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 0.09 %.
With a net margin of -4.84 %, Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc reported lower profitability than its competitors (3.76 %).
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc generated 0.32 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.32 % a year earlier.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2023
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Chemical Manufacturing industry grew revenue 2.6% year over year, combined, vs 0.4% for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc. Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.10% to 0.10%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (14) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SWIOU Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SWIOU Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SWIOU Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alto Ingredients Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Green Plains Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Rex American Resources Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Archer daniels midland Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Futurefuel Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The ethanol we produce is similar to ethanol produced by other domestic plants. According to the Renewable Fuels Association, as of October 27, 2017 there were 214 ethanol production facilities in the United States capable of producing 16.1 billion gallons based on nameplate capacity and seven additional plants under expansion or construction with capacity to produce an additional 463 million gallons. Further, the Renewable Fuels Association estimates that virtually none of the ethanol production capacity in the United States is idled. The top five producers account for approximately 45% of domestic production. We are in direct competition with many of these top five producers as well as other national producers, many of whom have greater resources and experience than we have and each of which is producing significantly more ethanol than we produce. In addition, we believe that the ethanol industry will continue to consolidate leading to a market where a small number of large ethanol producers with substantial production capacities will control an even larger portion of the U.S. ethanol production. In recent years, the ethanol industry has also seen increased competition from oil companies who have purchased ethanol production facilities. These oil companies are required to blend a certain amount of ethanol each year.
We may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our larger competitors and the oil companies who are capable of producing a significantly greater amount of ethanol, have multiple ethanol plants that may help them achieve certain efficiencies and other benefits that we cannot achieve with one ethanol plant or are able to operate at times when it is unprofitable for us to operate. For instance, ethanol producers that own multiple plants may be able to compete in the marketplace more effectively, especially during periods when operating margins are unfavorable, because they have the flexibility to run certain production facilities while reducing production or shutting down production at other facilities. These large producers may also be able to realize economies of scale which we are unable to realize or they may have better negotiating positions with purchasers. Further, new products or methods of ethanol production developed by larger and better-financed competitors could provide them competitive advantages over us.
Foreign Ethanol Competitors
In recent years, the ethanol industry has experienced increased competition
from international suppliers of ethanol and although ethanol imports have decreased
during the past few years, if competition from ethanol imports were to increase
again, such increased imports could negatively impact demand for domestic ethanol
which could adversely impact our financial results. Large international companies
with much greater resources than ours have developed, or are developing, increased
foreign ethanol production capacities.
Many international suppliers produce ethanol primarily from inputs other than
corn, such as sugarcane, and have cost structures that may be substantially
lower than U.S. based ethanol producers including us. Many of these international
suppliers are companies with much greater resources than us with greater production
capacities.
Brazil is the world’s second largest ethanol producer. Brazil makes ethanol
primarily from sugarcane as opposed to corn, and depending on feedstock prices,
may be less expensive to produce. Several large companies produce ethanol in
Brazil, including affiliates of Bunge. In 2017, 15.0 billion gallons of corn
based biofuels blending was mandated by the Renewable Fuel Standard, or RFS2,
when U.S. ethanol production was 15.8 billion gallons. Many in the ethanol industry
are concerned that certain provisions of RFS2 as adopted may disproportionately
benefit ethanol produced from sugarcane. This could make sugarcane based ethanol,
which is primarily produced in Brazil, more competitive in the United States
ethanol market. If this were to occur, it could reduce demand for the ethanol
that we produce. In recent years, sugarcane ethanol imported from Brazil has
been one of the most economical means for certain obligated parties to comply
with the RFS2 requirement to blend 4.3 billion gallons of advanced biofuels.
Effective March 16, 2015, the Brazilian government increased the required percentage
of ethanol in vehicle fuel sold in Brazil to 27% from 25% which, along with
more competitively priced ethanol produced from corn, significantly reduced
U.S. ethanol imports from Brazil as compared to imports during 2015 and 2016.
However, there has been an increase in U.S. ethanol imports from Brazil during
calendar year 2017 as compared to calendar 2016. Brazil favored sugar production
over ethanol production, as they were encouraged by the higher prices for the
sweetener in the international market. Energy Information Administration (“EIA”)
data shows ethanol imports from Brazil rose to 1,766 thousand barrels in the
first eight months of calendar 2017 from 819 thousand barrels in the first eight
months of calendar 2016. Based on the current strength of the United States
Dollar compared to the Brazilian Reis along with very favorable prices for sugarcane
based ethanol in the United States, specifically in California, it is possible
that ethanol imports from Brazil may continue to increase in Fiscal 2018 which
will further impact the level of ethanol supplies in the United States and may
result in ethanol price decreases.
Depending on feedstock prices, ethanol imported from foreign countries, including
Brazil, may be less expensive than domestically-produced ethanol. However, foreign
demand, transportation costs and infrastructure constraints may temper the market
impact on the United States.
Local Ethanol Production
Because we are located on the border of Iowa and Nebraska, and because ethanol
producers generally compete primarily with local and regional producers, the
ethanol producers located in Iowa and Nebraska presently constitute our primary
competition. According to the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, as of September,
2017, Iowa had 43 ethanol refineries in production, with a combined nameplate
capacity to produce 4.05 billion gallons of ethanol. The Nebraska Energy Office
reports that as of September 2017, there are currently 22 existing ethanol plants
in production inNebraska with a combined ethanol nameplate production capacity
of approximately 1.94 billion gallons.
Competition from Alternative Renewable Fuels
We anticipate increased competition from renewable fuels that do not use corn
as feedstock. Many of the current ethanol production incentives are designed
to encourage the production of renewable fuels using raw materials other than
corn, including cellulose. Cellulose is the main component of plant cell walls
and is the most common organic compound on earth. Cellulose is found in wood
chips, corn stalks, rice straw, amongst other common plants. Cellulosic ethanol
is ethanol produced from cellulose. Research continues regarding cellulosic
ethanol, and various companies are in various stages of developing and constructing
some of the first generation cellulosic plants. Several companies have commenced
pilot projects to study the feasibility of commercially producing cellulosic
ethanol and are producing cellulosic ethanol on a small scale and at a few companies
in the United States have begun producing on a commercial scale. Additional
commercial scale cellulosic ethanol plants could be completed in the near future,
although these cellulosic ethanol plants have faced some financial and technological
issues, If this technology can be profitably employed on a commercial scale,
it could potentially lead to ethanol that is less expensive to produce than
corn based ethanol. Cellulosic ethanol may also capture more government subsidies
and assistance than corn based ethanol. This could decrease demand for our product
or result in competitive disadvantages for our ethanol production process.
Because our Facility is designed as single-feedstock facilities, we have limited
ability to adapt the plant to a different feedstock or process system without
additional capital investment and retooling.
A number of automotive, industrial and power generation manufacturers are developing
alternative clean power systems using fuel cells, plug-in hybrids, electric
cars or clean burning gaseous fuels. Like ethanol, the emerging fuel cell industry
offers a technological option to address worldwide energy costs, the long-term
availability of petroleum reserves and environmental concerns. Fuel cells have
emerged as a potential alternative to certain existing power sources because
of their higher efficiency, reduced noise and lower emissions. Fuel cell industry
participants are currently targeting the transportation, stationary power and
portable power markets in order to decrease fuel costs, lessen dependence on
crude oil and reduce harmful emissions. If the fuel cell industry continues
to expand and gain broad acceptance and becomes readily available to consumers
for motor vehicle use, we may not be able to compete effectively. This additional
competition could reduce the demand for ethanol, which would negatively impact
our profitability.
Publicly Traded Peers of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 148.09 | 381.05 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,509.00 | 82,099.00 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 3,109.37 | 3,640.30 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 1,409.30 | 658.58 |
| Green Plains Inc | 1,242.91 | 1,829.36 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 350.87 | 350.34 |
| SUBTOTAL | 46,240.64 | 112,643.11 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
Sources: Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge | Named by the company | 85% |
| Renewable Fuels Association | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Archer daniels midland Co | Ag Services and Oilseeds 76.86 % |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | Biomass-based Diesel 90.62 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Ethanol Production 88.24 % |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Ethanol 88.64 % |
| Gevo inc | Gevo North Dakota Segment 88.55 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 148 | - | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,509 | 1,978,480 | 42,872 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 3,109 | 5,178,229 | 266,108 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 1,409 | 4,989,212 | 1,040,894 |
| Green Plains Inc | 1,243 | 2,849,477 | 193,986 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 351 | 4,379,203 | 409,072 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 46,093 | 2,286,257 | 49,368 |
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | United States 86.19 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 79 companies in Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc ranks #56 of 79 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.03 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,056, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linde Plc | 220,809 | 41.79 % |
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 61,877 | 11.71 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 51,936 | 9.83 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 24,029 | 4.55 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 56 | Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 157 | 0.03 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | Nl Industries inc | 286 | -3.07 % |
| 52 | Alto Ingredients Inc | 280 | 233.03 % |
| 53 | Futurefuel Corp | 221 | 27.43 % |
| 54 | Lake Area Corn Processors Llc | 215 | - |
| 55 | Comstock Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 56 | Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 157 | - |
| 57 | Aemetis Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 58 | Xcf Global Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 59 | Codexis inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 60 | Aduro Clean Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 61 | Liquidmetal Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Chemical Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (96 companies). See the full Chemical Manufacturing industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 4.67 % | 30.74 % (avg) | -26.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | 2.56 % | industry median | -6.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 5.42 % | 3.22 % (avg) | +2.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.54 % | 7.98 % (avg) | -5.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Chemical Manufacturing industry average (96 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Chemical Manufacturing industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 6.5x | 27.8x | -21.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.6x | 16.1x | -11.5x |
| P/B | - | 3.9x | - |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 0.90 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -23.23 % | -7.20 % | -1.77 % | -0.19 % | 3.60 % | -14.94 % | 81.84 % | 9.06 % |
| Operating Margin | 8.77 % | 5.10 % | 4.25 % | -1.42 % | -0.74 % | -1.17 % | 10.10 % | 7.16 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 15.38 % | 8.33 % | 7.04 % | -2.48 % | -1.37 % | -1.59 % | 13.73 % | - |
| P/E | 17.8x | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8x | 2.5x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Linde Plc alone holds 42% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,056 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.54 % vs industry average 7.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 6.9 points below the industry median.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (30.80 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Linde Plc, holding 41.79 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 0.08 | 1.82 | 0.26 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 0.47 | 1.36 | 0.36 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 2.10 | 6.32 | 0.32 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 2.53 | 6.65 | - |
| Green Plains Inc | 0.56 | 1.83 | 0.53 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 1.58 | 3.20 | 0.26 |
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | Q1 2023 | +0.4 % | - |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +320.3 % |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | Q4 2019 | +73.4 % | -68.2 % |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | +335.7 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Q2 2026 | -19.3 % | - |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Q2 2024 | -29.6 % | -62.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +14.4 % | +437.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | Q1 2023 | +21.5 % | +146.8 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | -10.8 % |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | Q4 2019 | +86.3 % | +458.2 % |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | Q2 2026 | -7.4 % | +6.0 % |
| Green Plains Inc | Q2 2026 | -34.8 % | -4.0 % |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | Q2 2024 | -28.2 % | -93.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 6.88% | 7.13% | 11.29% |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 3.33% | 5.61% | 7.77% |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 7.45% | 8.25% | 11.05% |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 17.11% | 16.54% | 19.26% |
| Green Plains Inc | 7.84% | 9.27% | 15.53% |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 12.75% | 15.18% | 19.26% |
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | 13.13 | 0.39 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 21.76 | 0.47 |
| Renewable Energy Group Inc | 16.23 | 0.85 |
| Rex American Resources Corporation | 11.67 | 2.14 |
| Green Plains Inc | 9.31 | 0.68 |
| Cardinal Ethanol Llc | 10.71 | 1.00 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.99 | 0.41 |
Sign in to see all peers for Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
