Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Newlake Capital Partners Inc's Competitiveness

Name: Newlake Capital Partners Inc Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Newlake Capital Partners Inc (NLCP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026

Competitors Tracked

Publicly traded peers

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

vs 100.00 % a year ago

Revenue Growth Y/Y

-6.53 %

Q2 2026

Net Margin

49.62 %

Q2 2026

Key Findings: Newlake Capital Partners Inc vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 49M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-2.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Peer revenue share: Newlake Capital Partners Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

NLCP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Newlake Capital Partners Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NLCP/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NLCP/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/NLCP/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

AI Integration via MCP

Connect Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant directly to this data.

For context: the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry grew revenue -0.8% year over year, combined, vs -6.5% for Newlake Capital Partners Inc. Newlake Capital Partners Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Newlake Capital Partners Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
NewLake Capital Partners, Inc.	Yes	No	No	-
Similar Growth & Profitability (8)	75.00 % (6 of 8)	37.50 % (3 of 8)	0.00 % (0 of 8)	28.60 % (2 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

NLCP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

NLCP Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

NLCP Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

NLCP Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Newlake Capital Partners Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in a competitive environment that includes firms with similar business models, sellers of hemp-derived products, independent investors, hedge funds, real estate investors, hard money lenders, cannabis operators, established industry companies, local real estate investors, and certain debt funds. Competitors may possess greater financial or operational resources, pay higher prices, accept higher risk levels, and benefit from lower capital costs and improved operating efficiencies. Cannabis cultivation facilities typically require capital investments exceeding $20.0 million, which may limit entry for smaller competitors.