Lxp Industrial Trust's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lxp Industrial Trust (LXP) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Lxp Industrial Trust vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 352M vs 1,780M combined for tracked competitors (16.5% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+0.4%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Lxp Industrial Trust generated 4.5% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 1.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 101.4% net margin compares with 23.2% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Lxp Industrial Trust accounted for 16.9% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 16.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $6.06M compares with $3.58M for the peer group (1.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LXP Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Lxp Industrial Trust reported revenue growth of 4.47 % year on year in Q3 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 0.98 %.
With a net margin of 101.40 %, Lxp Industrial Trust achieved higher profitability than its competitors (23.24 %).
Lxp Industrial Trust generated 16.89 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 16.42 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Lxp Industrial Trust vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Lxp Industrial Trust reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Lxp Industrial Trust and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Lxp Industrial Trust's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry grew revenue -1.2% year over year, combined, vs 4.5% for Lxp Industrial Trust. Lxp Industrial Trust's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.12% to 0.12%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (5) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LXP Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eastgroup Properties Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Terreno Realty Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Prologis Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Seven Hills Realty Trust | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lxp Industrial Trust's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Lxp Industrial Trust
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | 3,589.22 | 351.59 |
| Prologis Inc | 124,534.50 | 9,189.77 |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | 10,657.88 | 770.49 |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | 8,341.88 | 977.78 |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | 7,180.11 | 502.88 |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | 150.07 | 32.04 |
| SUBTOTAL | 154,453.65 | 11,824.55 |
Sources: Lxp Industrial Trust's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Lxp Industrial Trust versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Lxp Industrial Trust reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Duke Realty Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Prologis Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lxp Industrial Trust's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Lxp Industrial Trust reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Prologis Inc | Real Estate Operations Segment 93.21 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Lxp Industrial Trust's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | 3,589 | 6,061,828 | 1,922,259 |
| Prologis Inc | 124,534 | 3,279,717 | 1,574,047 |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | 10,658 | 7,408,548 | 3,041,135 |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | 8,342 | 3,819,469 | -1,873,434 |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | 7,180 | 10,699,574 | 8,230,234 |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | 150 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 150,864 | 3,575,245 | 1,449,157 |
Lxp Industrial Trust's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 180 companies in Lxp Industrial Trust's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Lxp Industrial Trust ranks #0 of 180 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 418, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welltower Inc | 182,201 | 11.99 % |
| 2 | Prologis Inc | 124,149 | 8.17 % |
| 3 | Equinix Inc | 105,714 | 6.95 % |
| 4 | American Tower Corporation | 88,705 | 5.84 % |
| 5 | Simon Property Group inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Digital Realty Trust Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Public Storage | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Realty Income Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ventas inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Crown Castle Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Lxp Industrial Trust | 3,554 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Lxp Industrial Trust's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-03.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (283 companies). See the full Real Estate Investment Trusts industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 81.43 % | 41.70 % (avg) | +39.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 91.40 % | 38.23 % (avg) | +53.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 57.75 % | 28.37 % (avg) | +29.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry average (283 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Real Estate Investment Trusts industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 30.9x | 30.0x | +0.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.9x | 17.5x | -4.6x |
| P/B | 1.7x | 1.9x | -0.1x |
| Return on Equity | 5.54 % | industry aggregate | -0.45 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 2.09 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 0.94 % | -17.55 % | 1.37 % | 4.10 % | -6.61 % | 5.99 % | 5.27 % | -2.30 % |
| Operating Margin | 38.65 % | 32.39 % | 71.30 % | 131.21 % | 31.75 % | 27.98 % | 29.14 % | 55.57 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.48 % | 2.25 % | 4.45 % | 7.78 % | 1.62 % | 1.48 % | 1.59 % | 3.36 % |
| P/E | 6.5x | 7.0x | 16.2x | 11.8x | 27.5x | 89.7x | 66.3x | 25.7x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 418 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 57.75 % vs industry average 28.37 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Lxp Industrial Trust's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Lxp Industrial Trust's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Lxp Industrial Trust falls in the Medium attractiveness / High strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Lxp Industrial Trust's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | 1.83 | 1.96 | 0.37 |
| Prologis Inc | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.61 |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.45 |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | 1.39 | 2.63 | 0.38 |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.12 |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | 23.73 | 133.72 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | Q3 2026 | +4.5 % | +135.3 % |
| Prologis Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.1 % | +70.7 % |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | Q3 2026 | +9.5 % | +17.1 % |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | Q3 2026 | -5.6 % | -81.3 % |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | Q2 2026 | +11.1 % | -38.3 % |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | Q3 2026 | +16.6 % | +134.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.3 % | +43.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lxp Industrial Trust's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | Q3 2026 | +6.6 % | +16.7 % |
| Prologis Inc | Q2 2026 | +717.8 % | +88.4 % |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | Q3 2026 | +26,065.3 % | +7.9 % |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | Q3 2026 | -1.5 % | -37.2 % |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | +44.1 % |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | Q3 2026 | - | - |
Lxp Industrial Trust's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | 3.19% | 3.18% | 5.54% |
| Prologis Inc | 4.45% | 3.12% | 7.64% |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | 5.69% | 5.95% | 8.90% |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | - | - | - |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | 7.04% | 7.02% | 9.17% |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | 2.06% | 2.06% | 5.04% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Lxp Industrial Trust's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Lxp Industrial Trust | 31.55 | 10.21 |
| Prologis Inc | 29.15 | 13.55 |
| Eastgroup Properties Inc | 33.49 | 13.83 |
| Rexford Industrial Realty Inc | - | 8.53 |
| Terreno Realty Corporation | 18.05 | 14.28 |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | 8.13 | 4.68 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 32.44 | 13.06 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.