Blusky Ai Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Blusky Ai Inc (IMII) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Blusky Ai Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4M vs 90,207M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.39M compares with $1.35M for the peer group (0.3x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Blusky Ai Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Blusky Ai Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Blusky Ai Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Blusky Ai Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | - | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (30) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
IMII Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gold Resource Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Augusta Gold Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Southern Copper Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | International Tower Hill Mines Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Blusky Ai Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Blusky Ai Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We compete with many companies in the mining business, including larger, more
established mining companies with substantial capabilities, personnel and financial
resources. There is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available for
claim-staking, lease or acquisition in the United States and other areas where
we may conduct exploration activities. Because we compete with individuals and
companies that have greater financial resources and larger technical staffs,
we may be at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring desirable mineral properties.
From time to time, specific properties or areas that would otherwise be attractive
to us for exploration or acquisition are unavailable due to their previous acquisition
by other companies or our lack of financial resources. Competition in the mining
industry is not limited to the acquisition of mineral properties but also extends
to the technical expertise to find, advance, and operate such properties; the
labor to operate the properties; and the capital needed to fund the acquisition
and operation of such properties. Competition may result in our company being
unable not only to acquire desired properties, but to recruit or retain qualified
employees, to obtain equipment and personnel to assist in our exploration activities
or to acquire the capital necessary to fund our operation and advance our properties.
Our inability to compete with other companies for these resources would have
a material adverse effect on our results of operation and business. The mineral
exploration industry is highly fragmented, and we are a very small participant
in this sector. Many of our competitors explore for a variety of minerals and
control many different properties around the world. Many of them have been in
business longer than we have and have established strategic partnerships and
relationships and have greater financial resources than we do.
Publicly Traded Peers of Blusky Ai Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | 0.01 | 3.55 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 168,000.53 | 15,787.50 |
| Newmont Corporation | 123,825.35 | 25,767.00 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 103,780.56 | 25,868.00 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 20,439.72 | 1,547.06 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 18,485.19 | 3,171.20 |
| SUBTOTAL | 459,653.08 | 91,946.05 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Blusky Ai Inc .
Sources: Blusky Ai Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Blusky Ai Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Blusky Ai Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Southern Copper Corp | Reportable subsegments 100.00 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Rod and Refining 33.08 % |
| Royal Gold Inc | Stream interest 66.67 % |
| Hecla Mining Company | Keno Hill 0.39 % |
| Gold Resource Corp | Oaxaca Mexico Segment 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Blusky Ai Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | 0 | 394,362 | -1,394,703 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 168,001 | 950,081 | 341,752 |
| Newmont Corporation | 123,825 | 1,472,400 | 501,086 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 103,781 | 892,000 | 158,276 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 20,440 | 39,668,103 | 19,097,205 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 18,485 | 1,210,381 | 324,583 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 459,653 | 1,345,920 | 353,636 |
Blusky Ai Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Southern Copper Corp | Other European Countries 6.87 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Mexico 44.60 % |
| Verde Resources Inc | US 96.41 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Blusky Ai Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 131 companies in Blusky Ai Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Blusky Ai Inc ranks #0 of 131 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 751, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhp Group Limited | 211,645 | 15.27 % |
| 2 | Southern Copper Corp | 166,346 | 12.00 % |
| 3 | Rio Tinto Plc | 152,559 | 11.01 % |
| 4 | Newmont Corporation | 124,220 | 8.96 % |
| 5 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Franco nevada Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Anglogold Ashanti Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cameco Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Blusky Ai Inc | 3 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Blusky Ai Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-03-21.
Blusky Ai Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | -56.48 % | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | 5.58 % | -16.92 % | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.71 % | 1.32 % | -0.06 % | -0.44 % | 1.02 % | 1,074.14 % | 8.29 % | 80.33 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Blusky Ai Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 751 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Blusky Ai Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Blusky Ai Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Blusky Ai Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 1,127.3 points above the industry aggregate.
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 33.6% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (36.70 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-15.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Blusky Ai Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | 0.24 | 0.27 | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | 2.36 | 4.46 | 0.61 |
| Newmont Corporation | 1.44 | 2.33 | 0.15 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 0.70 | 2.29 | 0.31 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 1.77 | 3.12 | 0.10 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 1.65 | 3.07 | 0.00 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Blusky Ai Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | Q2 2026 | +40.6 % | +71.5 % |
| Newmont Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.1 % | +8.5 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Q2 2026 | -7.3 % | +80.2 % |
| Royal Gold Inc | Q2 2026 | +114.9 % | +79.3 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Q2 2026 | +125.9 % | +72.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +119.0 % | +28.0 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Blusky Ai Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | Q2 2026 | +14.7 % | +79.4 % |
| Newmont Corporation | Q2 2026 | +4.3 % | +6.7 % |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.2 % | - |
| Royal Gold Inc | Q2 2026 | +148.5 % | -55.6 % |
| Coeur Mining Inc | Q2 2026 | +408.9 % | +106.7 % |
Blusky Ai Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | - | - | - |
| Southern Copper Corp | 25.88% | 28.19% | 49.18% |
| Newmont Corporation | 15.44% | 17.36% | 25.42% |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 7.86% | 7.15% | 14.70% |
| Royal Gold Inc | 9.04% | 8.45% | 11.58% |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 8.57% | 10.48% | 12.49% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Blusky Ai Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Blusky Ai Inc | - | 0.00 |
| Southern Copper Corp | 30.06 | 10.64 |
| Newmont Corporation | 14.69 | 4.81 |
| Freeport mcmoran Inc | 35.25 | 4.01 |
| Royal Gold Inc | 25.70 | 13.21 |
| Coeur Mining Inc | 14.53 | 5.83 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 19.04 | 5.00 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.