Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Gci Liberty Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Gci Liberty Inc (GLIBA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
0.00 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
6.13 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Gci Liberty Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,036M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Gci Liberty Inc ranks #29 of 58 companies by market capitalization in the Communications Services industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Gci Liberty Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

GLIBA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Gci Liberty Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GLIBA/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GLIBA/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GLIBA/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Communications Services industry grew revenue 7.4% year over year, combined, vs 0.0% for Gci Liberty Inc. Gci Liberty Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Gci Liberty Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Gci Liberty Inc No Yes No -
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 100% 100% 100% 50%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 56% 50% 50% 33%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 42.90 % (3 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Gci Liberty Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Gci Liberty Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Gci Liberty Inc's full market share breakdown »

GLIBA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

GLIBA Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Gci Liberty Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(4 of 10)
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(1 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Gci Liberty Inc - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Gci Liberty Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

GLIBA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

GLIBA High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

GLIBA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

GLIBA Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

GLIBA Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

GLIBA Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Gci Liberty Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

GCI Holdings operates in a highly competitive industry that includes numerous companies offering a wide range of communication, entertainment, and information products and services. The company faces competition from both established providers and new entrants, driven by rapid technological advancements and changing consumer behavior. Competition in the Internet sector is based on factors such as price, service bundles, technological capabilities, customer service, billing, and service quality, reliability, and availability. GCI Holdings' residential Internet services compete with fiber-to-the-home, fixed wireless broadband, and other Internet service providers across its service areas. Additionally, regulatory changes, including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), may increase wireless competition by influencing spectrum licensing in favor of competitors.

Gci Liberty Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Liberty Broadband Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Atn International inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Gci Liberty Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.