4front Ventures's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of 4front Ventures (FFNTF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: 4front Ventures vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 76M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-9.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: 4front Ventures accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
FFNTF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
4front Ventures generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Legal Cannabis industry grew revenue 35.0% year over year, combined, vs -25.5% for 4front Ventures. 4front Ventures's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.96% to 0.53%, a loss of 0.43 percentage points.
4front Ventures's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4front Ventures Corp | No | No | No | No |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | - | |||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 66.70 % (4 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
FFNTF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
FFNTF Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
FFNTF Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
4front Ventures's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
4front Ventures's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Health & Recreation, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Green Thumb Industries Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cresco Labs Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| MariMed, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for 4front Ventures's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
4front Ventures's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| 4front Ventures Corp | Massachusetts 46.01 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).