Symbolic Logic Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Symbolic Logic Inc (EVOL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Symbolic Logic Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 26M vs 723,006M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-37.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Symbolic Logic Inc generated 10.8% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2020, vs 10.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 2.0% net margin compares with 18.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Symbolic Logic Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.08M compares with $0.53M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
EVOL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2020
Symbolic Logic Inc reported revenue growth of 10.81 % year on year in Q3 2020, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.93 %.
With a net margin of 2.01 %, Symbolic Logic Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.95 %).
Symbolic Logic Inc generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.01 % a year earlier.
Symbolic Logic Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2020
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Symbolic Logic Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Symbolic Logic Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry grew revenue 1.3% year over year, combined, vs 10.8% for Symbolic Logic Inc. Symbolic Logic Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | - | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (46) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
EVOL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fastly Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Okta Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Akamai Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | A10 Networks Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Pitney Bowes Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Symbolic Logic Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Our principal competitors for Subscriber Acquisition and Activation are vendors such as Comptel-Nokia, Amdocs and Oracle, as well as billing vendors and vendors such as Ericsson. In the area of Subscriber Acquisition and Activation, we believe we hold a significant leadership position; however, we see occasional competition from Giesecke & Devrient GmbH and HP, as well as a few other smaller regional competitors
Competitors for Digital Engagement Customer Value Management, Retention and Loyalty, include specialist vendors such as Pontis (acquired by Amdocs), CRM software from vendors such as SAP and Oracle, Analytics software from vendors like SAS and a few independent software companies like FlyTxt and Pelatro.
For all of our products, our ability to compete successfully depends on a wide range of factors. First and foremost is our ability to deliver both marketing services and expert services based on our solutions platform, which offers a cost-effective way for our customers to benefit from our many years of experience and product investment. We deliver value by offering competitively priced quality solutions, tailored specifically to our customers’ network and IT infra-structure. After a customer implements our products, we often receive subsequent orders for enhancements to add functionality or increase capacity. Complex solutions tailored to customers’ needs are expensive and time consuming to replace, thus providing us with an incumbent advantage. Furthermore, many of our customer relationships span five years or more. We believe all of these factors give us a competitive advantage and can be a barrier to entry for potential competitors.
Publicly Traded Peers of Symbolic Logic Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | 5.40 | 26.07 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,795,216.66 | 331,839.00 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 481,578.75 | 6,156.87 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830.00 | 73,266.00 |
| Sap Se | 246,009.75 | 41,216.00 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,356.66 | 69,096.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,859,275.87 | 743,665.47 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Symbolic Logic Inc .
Sources: Symbolic Logic Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Symbolic Logic Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Devrient GmbH | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Symbolic Logic Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | Government Operating 51.15 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.22 % |
| Adobe Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
Symbolic Logic Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | 5 | 83,032 | 44,968 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,795,217 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 481,579 | 1,390,126 | 684,290 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| Sap Se | 246,010 | 374,691 | 74,592 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,357 | 226,322 | 35,129 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,859,270 | 525,004 | 123,124 |
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
Symbolic Logic Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 49.04 % |
| Salesforce Inc | Americas 64.97 % |
| Adobe Inc | Americas 58.69 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
Symbolic Logic Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 148 companies in Symbolic Logic Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Symbolic Logic Inc ranks #0 of 148 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 546, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automatic Data Processing Inc | 105,523 | 16.92 % |
| 2 | Workday Inc | 45,532 | 7.30 % |
| 3 | Infosys Limited | 43,117 | 6.91 % |
| 4 | Zscaler Inc | 31,483 | 5.05 % |
| 5 | Reddit Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Verisign Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Verisk Analytics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Toast Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Wipro Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Symbolic Logic Inc | 8 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Symbolic Logic Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-06-03.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Cloud Computing & Data Analytics industry average (203 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 27.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 16.4x | - |
| P/B | 0.5x | 4.0x | -3.5x |
| Return on Equity | 42.25 % | industry aggregate | 38.97 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -11.01 % | 1.95 % (avg) | -12.96 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 18.20 % | -13.83 % | -3.12 % | 16.28 % | 6.33 % | -15.95 % | 2.34 % | -100.00 % |
| Operating Margin | 28.43 % | 16.89 % | 22.58 % | 18.79 % | -52.24 % | -30.66 % | 3.72 % | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 12.32 % | 6.35 % | 9.46 % | 7.63 % | -24.40 % | -31.63 % | 5.22 % | -10.06 % |
| P/E | 21.0x | 19.5x | 13.8x | 23.6x | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 546 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Symbolic Logic Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Symbolic Logic Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Symbolic Logic Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 39.0 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-37.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | 17.78 | 23.28 | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40 | 6.94 | - |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
| Sap Se | 0.47 | 1.16 | - |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0.29 | 0.87 | 3.47 |
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | Q3 2020 | - | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +93.0 % | +224.4 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +7.7 % | +132.6 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -1.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +12.0 % | +0.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Symbolic Logic Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | Q3 2020 | - | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +54.6 % | +90.6 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +8.0 % | - |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.6 % | +9.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
Symbolic Logic Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | 40.51% | 42.25% | 42.25% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 31.17% | 34.61% | 37.17% |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
| Sap Se | 10.41% | 13.84% | 16.25% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 7.07% | 7.03% | 33.43% |
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Symbolic Logic Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Symbolic Logic Inc | - | 0.21 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 28.37 | 11.44 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 160.24 | 78.22 |
| Oracle Corporation | 20.79 | 5.43 |
| Sap Se | 34.35 | 5.97 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 19.55 | 3.04 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 33.59 | 7.88 |
Sign in to see all peers for Symbolic Logic Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.