Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Energy Transfer Operating L P's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Energy Transfer Operating L P (ETPPRC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2018
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
0.00 %
Q4 2018
Net Margin
7.15 %
Q4 2018

Key Findings: Energy Transfer Operating L P vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 38,895M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+39.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Energy Transfer Operating L P accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ETPPRC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2018

Energy Transfer Operating L P generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ETPPRC/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ETPPRC/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ETPPRC/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Natural Gas Utilities industry grew revenue 24.5% year over year, combined, vs 0.0% for Energy Transfer Operating L P. Energy Transfer Operating L P's share of combined industry revenue moved from 5.71% to 4.58%, a loss of 1.12 percentage points.

Energy Transfer Operating L P's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Energy Transfer Operating L p Yes No No No
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 71.40 % (5 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2018

100%market share
  • Energy Transfer Operating L P100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Energy Transfer Operating L P and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Energy Transfer Operating L P's full market share breakdown »

ETPPRC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ETPPRC Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

ETPPRC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

ETPPRC Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Energy Transfer Operating L P's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Energy Transfer Operating L p Crude oil transportation and services 29.98 % Investment in Sunoco LP 27.49 % NGL and refined products transportation and services 26.99 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).