Smart Powerr's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Smart Powerr (CREG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Smart Powerr vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 8,110M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+23.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-19.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Smart Powerr generated 425.4% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 15.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -505.2% net margin compares with 17.2% for the peer group.
- Scale: Smart Powerr ranks #133 of 168 companies by market capitalization in the Professional Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Smart Powerr accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.02M compares with $0.51M for the peer group (0.0x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CREG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Smart Powerr reported revenue growth of 425.35 % year on year in Q1 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 15.35 %.
With a net margin of -505.21 %, Smart Powerr reported lower profitability than its competitors (17.22 %).
Smart Powerr generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Smart Powerr vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Smart Powerr and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Smart Powerr's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs 425.4% for Smart Powerr. Smart Powerr's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Smart Powerr's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | No | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CREG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CREG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enphase Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Solaredge Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Canadian Solar inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | First Solar Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Smart Powerr's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Publicly Traded Peers of Smart Powerr Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | 2.81 | 0.35 |
| First Solar Inc | 18,634.40 | 5,378.07 |
| Enphase Energy Inc | 4,059.63 | 1,399.16 |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | 1,924.75 | 1,332.28 |
| Canadian Solar inc | 701.98 | 5,594.23 |
| SUBTOTAL | 25,323.57 | 13,704.08 |
Sources: Smart Powerr Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Smart Powerr Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Smart Powerr's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Sinoma Development Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beijing Shineng Zhongjin Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Equipment and System Engineer Co., Ltd. of Hangzhou Steam Turbine & Power Group (Hangzhou Turbine) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dalian East New Energy Development Co. Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Top Resource Conservation Engineering Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| China Everbright International Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kunming Sunwise Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Beijing Century Benefits Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Energy Saving Development Co., Ltd of China National Material Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| China Senyuan Electronic Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Smart Powerr's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Smart Powerr's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Canadian Solar inc | Recurrent Energy Segment 7.21 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Smart Powerr's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | 3 | 15,922 | -116,495 |
| First Solar Inc | 18,634 | 680,768 | 221,014 |
| Enphase Energy Inc | 4,060 | 487,171 | 47,005 |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | 1,925 | 372,562 | -75,587 |
| Canadian Solar inc | 702 | 444,445 | -14,599 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 25,321 | 508,771 | 52,977 |
Smart Powerr's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Enphase Energy Inc | United States 74.85 % |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | US 50.92 % |
| Canadian Solar inc | Asia 22.29 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Smart Powerr's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 155 companies in Smart Powerr's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Smart Powerr ranks #133 of 155 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,026, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Visa Inc | 704,590 | 22.57 % |
| 2 | Mastercard Incorporated | 501,774 | 16.07 % |
| 3 | Repay Holdings Corporation | 312,320 | 10.00 % |
| 4 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 252,525 | 8.09 % |
| 5 | Uber Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Accenture Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Pdd Holdings inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Orix Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Mercadolibre Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Uxin Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 133 | Smart Powerr Corp | 3 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Smart Powerr's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Smart Powerr's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 128 | New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership | 6 | -27.16 % |
| 129 | Sunrise Real Estate Group Inc | 5 | - |
| 130 | Cfn Enterprises Inc | 5 | -72.63 % |
| 131 | Sparta Commercial Services Inc | 4 | -40.68 % |
| 132 | Ten Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 133 | Smart Powerr Corp | 3 | - |
| 134 | Olb Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 135 | Oculus Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 136 | Treasure Global Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 137 | Reliability Incorporated | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 138 | Trinity Place Holdings inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Smart Powerr's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Smart Powerr's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Professional Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (230 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 46.38 % | 47.17 % (avg) | -0.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -682.82 % | industry median | -685.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -678.23 % | 5.74 % (avg) | -684.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.25 % (avg) | -4.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Smart Powerr's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Professional Services industry average (230 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 25.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 15.4x | - |
| P/B | 0.1x | 3.7x | -3.5x |
| Return on Equity | -1.95 % | industry aggregate | -23.59 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.90 % | 5.25 % (avg) | -6.15 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Smart Powerr's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 500.00 % | 26.37 % | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | 89.47 % | -707.13 % | - | - | - | - | - | -1,148.53 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 1.46 % | -19.31 % | -5.37 % | 3.39 % | -0.30 % | -1.63 % | -0.50 % | -1.21 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | 3.8x | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Smart Powerr's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Smart Powerr's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Smart Powerr falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Smart Powerr's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,026 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.25 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Smart Powerr's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Smart Powerr's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Smart Powerr's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Smart Powerr falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Smart Powerr's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+23.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 685.4 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 23.6 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-19.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Smart Powerr's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | 5.57 | 12.27 | 0.02 |
| First Solar Inc | 0.92 | 2.37 | 0.04 |
| Enphase Energy Inc | 0.43 | 2.24 | 1.03 |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | 0.57 | 2.12 | 0.77 |
| Canadian Solar inc | 0.33 | 1.02 | 2.14 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Smart Powerr's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | Q1 2026 | +425.3 % | - |
| First Solar Inc | Q2 2026 | -3.7 % | +23.6 % |
| Enphase Energy Inc | Q1 2026 | -20.5 % | - |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.6 % | - |
| Canadian Solar inc | Q4 2025 | -6.7 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | -5.9 % | +19.0 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Smart Powerr's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | Q1 2026 | +354.7 % | - |
| First Solar Inc | Q2 2026 | -24.5 % | -44.0 % |
| Enphase Energy Inc | Q1 2026 | -2.7 % | +36.2 % |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | -2.4 % | +559.4 % |
| Canadian Solar inc | Q4 2025 | -8.5 % | -13.5 % |
Smart Powerr's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | - | - | - |
| First Solar Inc | 13.05% | 16.09% | 18.02% |
| Enphase Energy Inc | 4.24% | 5.11% | 13.28% |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| Canadian Solar inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Smart Powerr's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp | - | 8.01 |
| First Solar Inc | 10.66 | 3.46 |
| Enphase Energy Inc | 30.60 | 2.90 |
| Solaredge Technologies Inc | - | 1.44 |
| Canadian Solar inc | - | 0.13 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 17.78 | 1.85 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.