Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Cardiff Lexington's Competitiveness

Name: Cardiff Lexington Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cardiff Lexington (CDIF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026

Competitors Tracked

Publicly traded peers

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

vs 100.00 % a year ago

Revenue Growth Y/Y

-22.57 %

Q2 2026

Net Margin

-114.79 %

Q2 2026

Key Findings: Cardiff Lexington vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 10M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-15.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Peer revenue share: Cardiff Lexington accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CDIF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Cardiff Lexington generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CDIF/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CDIF/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CDIF/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

For context: the Healthcare Facilities industry grew revenue 14.7% year over year, combined, vs -22.6% for Cardiff Lexington. Cardiff Lexington's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Cardiff Lexington's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
Cardiff Lexington Corporation	No	Yes	No	Yes
Similar Growth & Profitability (8)	12.50 % (1 of 8)	25.00 % (2 of 8)	12.50 % (1 of 8)	25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

CDIF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CDIF Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

CDIF Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

CDIF Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Cardiff Lexington's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company’s acquisition process involves financial analysis, document reviews, meetings with management, and consultations with industry experts, competitors, customers, and suppliers. Upon acquisition, the target company becomes a wholly owned subsidiary. The company generally seeks to own or control 100% of the equity interests or assets, although future acquisitions may involve less than full ownership.

Cardiff Lexington's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).

Company	Largest Segment	2nd Segment	3rd Segment
Cardiff Lexington Corporation	Healthcare Segment 100.00 %	-	-

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).