Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited (ANPA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2025
Net Margin
2.13 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited ranks #117 of 168 companies by market capitalization in the Professional Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

ANPA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ANPA/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ANPA/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/ANPA/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited - - - -
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 33% 86% 71% 25%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited's full market share breakdown »

ANPA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

ANPA Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
20%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited -94.20 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

ANPA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

ANPA Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Rich Sparkle Holdings Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The financial printing services market in Hong Kong has high entry barriers due to significant initial capital investments in advanced printing equipment, software, operational facilities, and raw materials. Providers are required to offer continuous, around-the-clock services. Competition in the market is based on efficiency, service quality, turnaround time, design capability, and pricing. The company maintains a competitive position through customer service, timely fulfillment of client requirements, and consistent quality of deliverables. The business experiences seasonality, with increased demand in the second quarter of each calendar year, driven by Hong Kong Listing Rules mandating periodic financial reporting for companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.