Netlist Inc's Suppliers Performance
NLST's Supply Chain
|
NLST Costs vs Sales of Suppliers Growth |
Netlist Inc's Suppliers recorded an increase in sales by 2.06 % year on year in Q1 2025, from the previous quarter, sales fell by -6.81 %, Netlist Inc's cost of sales deteriorated by -22.86 % year on year, relative to one quarter ago cost of sales fell by -20.59 % in Q1.
•
More on NLST Suppliers
|
|
Netlist Inc's Suppliers recorded an increase in sales by 2.06 % year on year in Q1 2025, from the previous quarter, sales fell by -6.81 %, Netlist Inc's cost of sales deteriorated by -22.86 % year on year, compare to one quarter ago cost of sales fell by -20.59 % in Q1.
•
More on NLST Suppliers
Select the Relationship:
|
|
Select the Category:
|
|
Netlist Inc's Comment on Supply Chain
We manufacture substantially all of our memory subsystem products at our facility
in the PRC, which is certified in International Organization for Standardization
(“ISO”) 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems and ISO 14001:2004 Environmental
Management Standards. Our in-house manufacturing function, combined with our engineering
and design capabilities, allows us to assemble our memory subsystems quickly and
in high volume. Our manufacturing facility is capable of surface mount assembly,
subsystem testing, system-level burn-in testing, programming, marking, labeling
and packaging. Manufacturing cycle times for our memory subsystem products, from
receipt of order, are typically one week or less and in some cases as short as
two days.
We schedule production based on purchase order commitments and anticipated
orders. We release raw materials to the manufacturing floor by means of an online
shop floor control system, which allows for internal quality analysis, direct
access to inventory information and production floor material tracking. We have
a flexible manufacturing workforce, which allows us to manage unforecasted demand.
We perform ongoing reliability testing on our memory subsystems and share the
results of that testing with our customers. In addition, we have implemented
procedures that require all of our memory subsystems to undergo functional and
system burn-in testing prior to delivery to a customer. We also supplement our
test capabilities with advanced imaging technology to inspect the quality of
our assemblies.
Supply
We acquire components and materials, such as field-programmable gate arrays
(“FPGAs”), ASICs, DRAM ICs and NAND flash, directly from integrated
circuit manufacturers and assemble them into our finished subsystem products.
We also purchase some of these component products from Samsung under the terms
of the JDLA, and from alternative suppliers, for the purpose of resale to customers
directly.
We have developed supplier relationships with several manufacturers of these
component products, and we typically qualify our memory subsystem products with
our customers using multiple component manufacturers. However, our actual purchases
of component products, both for integration into our products and for resale,
are concentrated in a small number of suppliers, including an affiliate of Samsung,
from which we obtained 60% and 73% of our total inventory purchases in 2017
and 2016, respectively, and Memorysolution GmbH from which we obtained 10% of
our total inventory purchases in 2017. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report for more information about
our supplier concentrations.
We order component products based primarily on forecasts of customer demand,
which subjects us to certain inventory risks in the event our forecasts are
not accurate. In order to mitigate these inventory risks, we seek to resell
to distributors and other users of memory integrated circuits excess quantities
of the component inventories we have purchased for integration in our memory
subsystem products.
Our quality assurance engineers work with our suppliers to ensure that the
raw materials we receive meet our quality standards. These engineers also perform
on-site supplier factory audits and use our internal test and inspection systems
to verify that purchased components and materials meet our specifications. Our
supplier quality program and incoming material quality control program are important
aspects of our manufacturing and sale processes.
Netlist Inc's Comment on Supply Chain
We manufacture substantially all of our memory subsystem products at our facility
in the PRC, which is certified in International Organization for Standardization
(“ISO”) 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems and ISO 14001:2004 Environmental
Management Standards. Our in-house manufacturing function, combined with our engineering
and design capabilities, allows us to assemble our memory subsystems quickly and
in high volume. Our manufacturing facility is capable of surface mount assembly,
subsystem testing, system-level burn-in testing, programming, marking, labeling
and packaging. Manufacturing cycle times for our memory subsystem products, from
receipt of order, are typically one week or less and in some cases as short as
two days.
We schedule production based on purchase order commitments and anticipated
orders. We release raw materials to the manufacturing floor by means of an online
shop floor control system, which allows for internal quality analysis, direct
access to inventory information and production floor material tracking. We have
a flexible manufacturing workforce, which allows us to manage unforecasted demand.
We perform ongoing reliability testing on our memory subsystems and share the
results of that testing with our customers. In addition, we have implemented
procedures that require all of our memory subsystems to undergo functional and
system burn-in testing prior to delivery to a customer. We also supplement our
test capabilities with advanced imaging technology to inspect the quality of
our assemblies.
Supply
We acquire components and materials, such as field-programmable gate arrays
(“FPGAs”), ASICs, DRAM ICs and NAND flash, directly from integrated
circuit manufacturers and assemble them into our finished subsystem products.
We also purchase some of these component products from Samsung under the terms
of the JDLA, and from alternative suppliers, for the purpose of resale to customers
directly.
We have developed supplier relationships with several manufacturers of these
component products, and we typically qualify our memory subsystem products with
our customers using multiple component manufacturers. However, our actual purchases
of component products, both for integration into our products and for resale,
are concentrated in a small number of suppliers, including an affiliate of Samsung,
from which we obtained 60% and 73% of our total inventory purchases in 2017
and 2016, respectively, and Memorysolution GmbH from which we obtained 10% of
our total inventory purchases in 2017. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report for more information about
our supplier concentrations.
We order component products based primarily on forecasts of customer demand,
which subjects us to certain inventory risks in the event our forecasts are
not accurate. In order to mitigate these inventory risks, we seek to resell
to distributors and other users of memory integrated circuits excess quantities
of the component inventories we have purchased for integration in our memory
subsystem products.
Our quality assurance engineers work with our suppliers to ensure that the
raw materials we receive meet our quality standards. These engineers also perform
on-site supplier factory audits and use our internal test and inspection systems
to verify that purchased components and materials meet our specifications. Our
supplier quality program and incoming material quality control program are important
aspects of our manufacturing and sale processes.
NLST's Suppliers Net Income grew by |
NLST's Suppliers Net margin grew in Q1 to |
16.7 % |
19.41 % |
NLST's Suppliers Net Income grew by 16.7 % |
NLST's Suppliers Net margin grew in Q1 to 19.41 % |
NLST's vs. Suppliers, Data
(Revenue and Income for Trailing 12 Months, in Millions of $, except Employees)
COMPANY NAME |
MARKET CAP |
REVENUES |
INCOME |
EMPLOYEES |
Netlist Inc
|
176.20 |
139.47 |
-46.38 |
66 |
Agilent Technologies inc
|
35,134.80 |
6,614.00 |
1,403.00 |
17,900 |
|
Applied Materials Inc
|
160,719.16 |
28,089.00 |
6,758.00 |
35,700 |
Applied Materials Inc's revenue correlates notably with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.566 |
Amkor Technology Inc
|
5,417.89 |
6,273.15 |
317.60 |
28,700 |
The revenue of Amkor Technology Inc does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.090 |
Asml Holding Nv
|
315,639.65 |
31,654.04 |
8,480.19 |
39,000 |
The revenue of Asml Holding Nv does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.146 |
Ase Technology Holding Co Ltd
|
46,364.46 |
19,004.39 |
1,218.42 |
25,000 |
The revenue of Ase Technology Holding Co Ltd does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.163 |
Atomera Incorporated
|
144.11 |
0.12 |
-18.82 |
20 |
The factor of 0.251 indicates a mild correlation between Atomera Incorporated's revenue and those of Netlist Inc. |
Bel Fuse Inc
|
213.91 |
558.10 |
51.64 |
8,955 |
|
Cognyte Software Ltd
|
636.84 |
349.92 |
-7.23 |
1,000 |
The revenue of Cognyte Software Ltd does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.137 |
Cohu Inc
|
945.49 |
390.96 |
-85.99 |
997 |
|
Data I
|
28.91 |
21.85 |
-2.67 |
95 |
|
Dover Corp
|
26,122.84 |
7,517.87 |
3,549.24 |
25,000 |
A negative correlation coefficient of -0.237 implies that the revenue of Dover Corp does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. |
Esco Technologies inc
|
5,000.45 |
1,071.86 |
118.00 |
1,197 |
The revenue of Esco Technologies inc does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.095 |
Formfactor inc
|
2,801.49 |
765.71 |
54.23 |
2,115 |
Among Netlist Inc suppliers, the revenue of Formfactor inc has shown a strong correlation over the past 2 years. The correlation coefficient is 0.711 |
Jfrog Ltd
|
4,518.60 |
450.71 |
-78.95 |
1,400 |
Among Netlist Inc suppliers, the revenue of Jfrog Ltd has shown a strong correlation over the past 2 years. The correlation coefficient is 0.714 |
International Business Machines Corporation
|
268,105.99 |
62,832.00 |
5,473.00 |
305,300 |
The factor of 0.212 indicates a mild correlation between International Business Machines Corporation's revenue and those of Netlist Inc. |
Kla Corporation
|
123,249.29 |
11,550.16 |
3,695.24 |
15,000 |
The factor of 0.414 indicates a mild correlation between Kla Corporation's revenue and those of Netlist Inc. |
Kulicke And Soffa Industries Inc
|
1,933.06 |
691.08 |
21.50 |
2,681 |
|
Lam Research Corporation
|
131,038.41 |
17,135.45 |
4,658.41 |
17,450 |
Lam Research Corporation's revenue correlates notably with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.597 |
3m Company
|
85,353.57 |
24,513.00 |
4,377.00 |
85,000 |
|
Model N Inc
|
1,176.75 |
254.35 |
0.26 |
500 |
Among Netlist Inc suppliers, the revenue of Model N Inc has shown a strong correlation over the past 2 years. The correlation coefficient is 0.820 |
National Instruments Corp
|
8,047.58 |
1,729.83 |
179.40 |
8,000 |
The factor of 0.265 indicates a mild correlation between National Instruments Corp's revenue and those of Netlist Inc. |
Newmont Corporation
|
67,766.51 |
19,669.00 |
5,104.00 |
21,700 |
Among Netlist Inc suppliers, the revenue of Newmont Corporation has shown a strong correlation over the past 2 years. The correlation coefficient is 0.756 |
Orbital Infrastructure Group Inc
|
1.64 |
332.15 |
-263.15 |
60 |
Among Netlist Inc suppliers, the revenue of Orbital Infrastructure Group Inc has shown a strong correlation over the past 2 years. The correlation coefficient is 0.742 |
Park Aerospace Corp
|
310.12 |
61.64 |
5.88 |
300 |
The revenue of Park Aerospace Corp does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.018 |
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
|
9,910.22 |
802.77 |
89.25 |
2,012 |
The revenue of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.124 |
Skywater Technology Inc
|
475.04 |
323.93 |
-4.10 |
702 |
Skywater Technology Inc 's revenue correlates notably with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.645 |
Tower Semiconductor Ltd
|
5,088.01 |
1,436.12 |
207.22 |
3,140 |
The revenue of Tower Semiconductor Ltd does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.148 |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
|
1,197,929.27 |
70,598.80 |
27,793.20 |
50,000 |
The revenue of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited does not correlate significantly with that of Netlist Inc. The correlation coefficient is 0.153 |
Wolfspeed Inc
|
204.68 |
759.50 |
-1,512.90 |
5,013 |
|
SUBTOTAL |
2,504,278.75 |
315,451.45 |
71,580.87 |
703,937 |
News about
Netlist Inc Contracts
|
|