CSIMarket
Company Name or Ticker Symbol
Search for other Categories
 


Peabody Energy Corp  (BTU)
Other Ticker:  
 
    Sector  Energy    Industry Coal Mining
 

Peabody Energy's

Competitiveness


 

BTU Sales vs. its Competitors Q1 2017




Comparing the results to its competitors, Peabody Energy reported Total Revenue increase in the 1 quarter 2017 by 29.11 % year on year.
The sales growth was above Peabody Energy's competitors average revenue growth of 16.01 %, recorded in the same quarter.

List of BTU Competitors

With net margin of 9.57 % company reported lower profitability than its competitors.

More on BTU Margin Comparisons


   
       
 
You need to upgrade your Flash Player
   
     
       
 
You need to upgrade your Flash Player
   
     
       
 
You need to upgrade your Flash Player
   
     
       
 
You need to upgrade your Flash Player
   
     
       
 
You need to upgrade your Flash Player
   
     
       
 

Net Income Comparison


Peabody Energy CorpPeabody Energy achieved net profit of $127 millions compare to net loss of $-165 millions recorded in same quarter a year ago.

<<  More on BTU Income Comparisons
   
     


Peabody Energy's Comment on Competitors and Industry Peers


The markets in which we sell our coal are highly competitive. We compete directly with other coal producers and, with respect to our thermal coal products, indirectly with producers of other energy products that provide an alternative to coal use. We compete on the basis of coal quality and characteristics, delivered price, customer service and support and reliability of supply. Our principal U.S. direct competitors (listed alphabetically) are other large coal producers, including Alliance Resource Partners, Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Arch Coal, Inc. and Cloud Peak Energy Inc.,. Major international direct competitors (listed alphabetically) include Anglo-American PLC, BHP Billiton, China

Coal, Glencore Xstrata PLC, Rio Tinto and Shenhua Group.
Demand for coal and the prices that we will be able to obtain for our coal are influenced by factors beyond our control, including global economic conditions, the demand for electricity and steel, the impact of weather on heating and cooling demand and taxes and environmental regulations imposed by the U.S. and foreign governments. Metallurgical coal demand is also impacted by competing technologies used to make steel, some of which do not use coal as a manufacturing input.

The use of thermal coal is further influenced by the availability and relative cost of alternative fuels, with customers focused on securing the lowest cost fuel supply in order to produce electric power reliably at a competitive price. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported in its World Energy



<<  See the full list of BTU competitors


Competitiveness By Company's Divisions




You need to upgrade your Flash Player




CSIMarket Company, Sector, Industry, Market Analysis, Stock Quotes, Earnings, Economy, News and Research.  Free Stock Market News Feeds
   Copyright © 2017 CSIMarket, Inc. All rights reserved. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - UPDATED (Read about our Privacy Policy)
Intraday Data provided by Barchart and subject to terms of use. To view Intraday Stock Data Java must be installed. Java content may be prohibited by the security software, to see the stock quotes, choose "allow content from this page" option. Stock Price, historical and current end-of-day data provided by eoddata. Intraday data delayed per exchange requirements. S&P/Dow Jones Indices (SM) from Barchart and Eoddata. All quotes are in local exchange time. Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and other exchanges. Fundamental and financial data for Stocks, Sector, Industry, and Economic Indicators provided by CSIMarket.com